Background: Determining the most effective approach for students' successful academic performance and achievement on the national licensure examination for RNs is important to nursing education and practice.

Method: A quasi-experimental design was used to compare didactic instruction and test-enhanced learning among nursing students divided into two fundamental nursing review courses in their final semester. Students in each course were subdivided into low-, intermediate-, and high-score groups based on their first examination scores. Mixed model of repeated measure and two-way analysis of variance were applied to evaluate students' academic results and both teaching approaches.

Results: Intermediate-scoring students' performances improved more through didactic instruction, whereas low-scoring students' performances improved more through test-enhanced learning.

Conclusion: Each method had differing effects on individual subgroups within the different performance level groups of their classes, which points to the importance of considering both the didactic and test-enhanced learning approaches. [J Nurs Educ. 2017;56(11):683-687.].

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20171020-09DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

didactic instruction
12
test-enhanced learning
12
instruction test-enhanced
8
learning nursing
8
nursing review
8
students' performances
8
performances improved
8
effects didactic
4
test-enhanced
4
nursing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!