Total (Transthoracic and Transabdominal) Robotic Radical Three-Stage Esophagectomy-Initial Indian Experience.

Indian J Surg

Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital, HAL Airport Road, Bangalore, Karnataka India 560017.

Published: October 2017

This study aims to evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of total robot-assisted three-stage esophagectomy. From July 2011 to June 2014, 35 histologically proven resectable carcinoma esophagus patients underwent robot-assisted transthoracic and transperitoneal three-stage esophagectomy. In the initial ten cases, total docking time, thoracic docking time, total operative time, thoracic-phase operative time, and blood loss were 67.9 ± 13.24, 32.2 ± 9.74, 429.2 ± 57.65, and 96.6 ± 20.33 min and 433.20 ± 48.72 ml, respectively. In the subsequent 25 cases, all parameters decreased significantly (33.20 ± 4.16, 13.76 ± 3.43, 321.13 ± 13.75, and 57.04 ± 9.15 min and 256.32 ± 17.52 ml, respectively). Median numbers of lymph node dissected were 32. One case was converted to open method, and there was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Two cases required ventilator support for 1 day, with ICU stay for 1 day in 15 patients and 2 days in five patients. Two patients had major complications. Median hospital stay was 8 days. All had microscopic negative resection margins. Robot-assisted three-stage esophagectomy has the benefits of minimally invasive surgery and immediate oncological outcomes are comparable to conventional open surgery. Therefore, it is a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of esophageal cancer in selected patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653574PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-016-1498-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three-stage esophagectomy
12
robot-assisted three-stage
8
docking time
8
operative time
8
patients
5
total
4
total transthoracic
4
transthoracic transabdominal
4
transabdominal robotic
4
robotic radical
4

Similar Publications

Upper Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy Utilizing Prone-Position Thoracoscopy for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers.

J Clin Med

November 2024

Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery Unit, First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian Universtity of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Esophagectomy is the mainstay of treatment in esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) remains a challenging procedure and has been associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. Routine lymphadenectomy includes two-field lymphadenectomy for distal-esophageal or gastroesophageal junction Siewert I-II tumors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Esophageal cancer is a prevalent cancer, with a high incidence in low socioeconomic category countries. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is increasingly being used to treat this malignant condition. However, anastomotic stricture is a serious complication post esophagectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An audit of perioperative speech pathology intervention on improving enhanced recovery after surgery in oesophagectomy patients.

Int J Speech Lang Pathol

September 2024

Allied Health Research Unit, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of a speech-language pathology (SLP) pathway on recovery following oesophagectomy.

Method: An audit was conducted at a single metropolitan public hospital in Sydney, Australia. Patients between 2014-2021 undergoing a three-stage oesophagectomy ( = 41) were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gastrectomy and esophagectomy are the most performed surgeries in the treatment of both esophageal and gastric cancers. The type of esophagectomy depends on the type of malignancy, site of the tumor, criteria of resection, and field of resection. The three standard approaches to esophagectomy are the transhiatal approach, the left thoracoabdominal approach, and a three-stage procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Thoracic epidural placement is considered the gold standard for pain management for abdominal or thoracic surgery. It provides analgesia superior to that provided by opioids with a decreased risk of pulmonary complications. Insertion of a thoracic epidural catheter requires the knowledge and expertise of an anesthetist; epidural catheter insertion may be challenging especially when sited in the higher thoracic region, in patients with unusual neuraxial anatomy, patients unable to position adequately for insertion or morbidly obese patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!