Legal insanity is a peculiar element of criminal law, because it brings together two very different disciplines: psychiatry and psychology on the one hand and the law on the other. One of the basic questions regarding evaluations of defendants concerns the question of who should establish "true mental disorder," the judge or the behavioral expert? This question is complicated, and in this contribution it will be explored based on a Dutch case that was eventually decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). We will argue that the ECtHR provides a valuable legal framework. Based on its merits, the framework could also be of interest to countries outside the Court's jurisdiction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650690PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00199DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

european court
8
court human
8
human rights
8
establishes presence
4
presence mental
4
mental disorder
4
disorder defendants?
4
defendants? medicolegal
4
medicolegal considerations
4
considerations european
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!