In determining dose limiting toxicities in Phase I studies, it is necessary to attribute adverse events (AE) to being drug related or not. Such determination is subjective and may introduce bias. In this paper, we develop methods for removing or at least diminishing the impact of this bias on the estimation of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The approach we suggest takes into account the subjectivity in the attribution of AE by using model-based dose escalation designs. The results show that gains can be achieved in terms of accuracy by recovering information lost to biases. These biases are a result of ignoring the errors in toxicity attribution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659366PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12195DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse events
8
phase designs
4
designs allow
4
allow uncertainty
4
uncertainty attribution
4
attribution adverse
4
events determining
4
determining dose
4
dose limiting
4
limiting toxicities
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!