Objectives: To determine differences in certain variables reflecting clinical practice in a group of emergency physicians with varying levels of experience and to explore whether differences are associated with experience.

Material And Methods: Retrospective observational study of differences in variables reflecting emergency physicians' practice between 2005 and 2012. We studied work variables (months worked, patients treated, caseload distribution according to triage levels), patient management variables (consultation with other specialists, admissions, ambulance requests), diagnostic procedures ordered (simple radiographs, laboratory tests, ultrasound or computed tomography imaging), and time patients discharged home spent in the department (arrival to discharge). We explored relationships between these variables and the emergency physician's experience using linear regression analysis, followed by the construction of multivariable models to adjust for physician characteristics.

Results: Data for 50 emergency medicine physicians, in 291 years of work, were analyzed. The specialists' experience ranged from 1 to 22 years (mean [SD], 9.5 [5.8] years). They attended between 47 and 158 patients monthly (mean, 86 [19] patients). The physicians' experience was inversely and independently related to the mean number of patients attended monthly and the percentage of patients assigned a triage level of 1 or 2. Experience was directly and independently related to discharged patients' time spent in the emergency department and number of simple radiographs ordered. All associations were small (R2<0.010), however. Those variables continued to show statistically significant associations after increasingly complex modeling to adjust for the following physician variables: physician, age, sex, specialty, residency training in the same hospital).

Conclusion: The practice of emergency physicians with more accumulated experience shows slight but significant differences from the practice of less experienced physicians.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

emergency department
8
differences variables
8
variables reflecting
8
simple radiographs
8
emergency
6
patients
6
variables
5
experience
5
[differences practice
4
practice physicians
4

Similar Publications

Approximately 22 ​% of the United States population communicates in a non-English language, potentially impacting healthcare communication and outcomes. Few studies have examined the association between non-English primary language (NEPL) and surgical outcomes and none to our knowledge in patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation within a safety net system. In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis on adults who underwent AVF creation for hemodialysis access between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trends and predictors of leaving before medically advised in US emergency departments from 2016 to 2021.

Am J Emerg Med

December 2024

Department of Health Policy & Organization, School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Background: Leaving before medically advised (BMA) is a significant issue in the US healthcare system, leading to adverse health outcomes and increased costs. Despite previous research, multi-year studies using up-to-date nationwide emergency department (ED) data, are limited. This study examines factors associated with leaving BMA from EDs and trends over time, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Nephrology has seen an uptake in transition to remote care delivery. The impact of telenephrology care on chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression is not well defined.

Methods: We analyzed data from patients naturally selected for telenephrology versus standard, in-person visits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prehospital Interventions to Reduce Discomfort From Spinal Immobilization in Adult Trauma Patients: A Scoping Review.

J Trauma Nurs

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Dr Mota); Health School, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu, Portugal (Drs Mota, Santos, and Cunha); Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Coimbra, Portugal (Drs Mota and Cunha); CINTESIS@RISE - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Drs Mota and Santos); Academic Clinical Centre of Beiras, Covilhã, Portugal (Drs Mota and Cunha); Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Drs Melo and Santos); Portugal Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Coimbra, Portugal (Dr Santos); Hospital São Teotónio, Tondela Viseu Hospital Centre, Viseu, Portugal (Dr Abrantes); Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Seia, Seia, Portugal (Dr Monteiro); and Nursing School of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Dr Santos).

Background: Spinal immobilization, a widely used trauma prehospital intervention, is known to cause discomfort, yet little is known about interventions to reduce this discomfort.

Objective: This scoping review aims to evaluate prehospital interventions to reduce discomfort from spinal immobilization in adult trauma patients.

Method: This scoping review assessed prehospital pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to address discomfort from spinal immobilization in adult trauma patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trauma Patient Transitional Work: A Multidisciplinary Feasibility Survey of Planned Behavior Elements.

J Trauma Nurs

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Penn Medicine, Department of Advanced Practice & Trauma Surgical Critical Care (Dr Saucier), Biostatistics, Hearing, & Speech, Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (Dr Dietrich), School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University (Drs Maxwell and Minnick), Nashville, Tennessee; David E. Longnecker Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (Dr Lane-Fall), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Surgical Service Line (Dr Messing), Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia.

Background: Patient transitions in critical care require coordination across provider roles and rely on the quality of providers' actions to ensure safety. Studying the behavior of providers who transition patients in critical care may guide future interventions that ultimately improve patient safety in this setting.

Objective: To establish the feasibility of using the Theory of Planned Behavior in a trauma environment and to describe provider behavior elements during trauma patient transfers (de-escalations) to non-critical care units.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!