The goal of this research was to observe the influence of electroacupuncture (EA) and laser-acupuncture on the return of tactile/pain sensitivity in patients who underwent orthognathic surgery. Thirty volunteers subjected to orthognathic surgery were evaluated and randomly divided into 2 groups, in which 3 treatments were evaluated: control ( = 30) (G0, medication + placebo laser treatment) and 2 experimental treatments ( = 15) (G1, medication + EA) or G2 (medication + laser-acupuncture). The control group had = 30 because for each experimental treatment conducted on a volunteer's hemi-face, there was a control treatment on the other hemi-face. In G1, medication was given with EA, with needles placed at predetermined points (ST 4 [], M-HN-18 [], CV 24 [], ST 5 [], ST 6 [], and point A1 [YNSA]). For electrostimulation, the device used delivered transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of a burst type, with intensity and frequency variations of T = 220 ms and F = 4 Hz (30 minutes, 2 × /week). In G2, in addition to the medication, laser irradiation (at 780 nm) was applied on acupuncture points (at 0.04 cm, 70 mW, 6 s/point, 0.42 J/point, 10 J/cm, 2 × /week). All volunteers were evaluated before and during the 4 months following the surgery. Tactile sensitivity was assessed by mechanical brushing (brush #s 2 and 12) and by a 2-point discrimination test, using a bow compass. A pain test was performed with a pulp electrical test that stimulates intact nerves of the dentin-pulp complex. A Kaplan-Meier test was performed, and survival curves were plotted for comparison between groups. Cox regression analysis was also conducted (α = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences among the groups for the 2-point discrimination test (brushes #2 and #12) on the buccal mucosa region and for the pulp test on all evaluated regions. However, the tactile test using brush #12 revealed significant differences between G1 and the other groups when considering the lower lip ( = 0.024) and chin ( = 0.028) areas. Only EA was able to influence-using the brushing test (brush #12)-the return of tactile sensitivity on the chin and lower lip positively after combined orthognathic surgery and genioplasty.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653343 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acu.2017.1228 | DOI Listing |
Clin Oral Investig
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, the Netherlands.
Objectives: To assess the effect of patient positioning and general anesthesia on the condylar position in orthognathic surgery.
Materials And Methods: This prospective study included patients undergoing orthognathic surgery between 2019 and 2020. Four weeks prior to surgery (T0) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and intra-oral scans (IOS) were acquired in an upright position.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
December 2024
Professor, Private Practice, Proimtech A.Ş., Istanbul, Turkey.
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after orthognathic surgery remains one of the most common side effects despite the use of several medications.
Purpose: The study aimed to compare the frequencies of PONV between a combination of metoclopramide with granisetron and granisetron alone.
Study Design, Setting, Sample: A randomized double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 66 consecutive patients who underwent orthognathic surgery at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Bezmialem Vakif University.
BMC Oral Health
January 2025
School of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Background: Orthodontic-orthognathic treatment is the standard of care for moderate and/or severe skeletal class III (SCIII) malocclusion. Following orthognathic surgery, morphological changes in the temporomandibular joint structures (TMJ) may contribute to condylar resorption (CR).
Objectives: This systematic review aimed to identify the morphological signs of condylar resorption (changes in the condylar head, position, neck, disk, and joint space) following orthognathic surgery in patients with SCIII compared with those with skeletal class II (SCII) malocclusion.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain; Maxillofacial Institute, Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain.
A facial appearance of premature aging due to poor bone support of the soft tissues is frequently found in patients with midface hypoplasia. This study was performed to evaluate the changes in the soft tissues of the cheek area in patients subjected to bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. The cheek line angle and length of 27 consecutive patients who underwent bimaxillary surgery, were measured on cone beam computed tomography scans obtained before surgery and at 1 and 12 months after surgery using 3D software.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Oncol Nurs
January 2025
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology &National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. Electronic address:
Purpose: To evaluate the current status of discharge readiness among postoperative oral cancer patients and identify the primary associated factors.
Methods: Information from 713 oral cancer patients was collected using questionnaire surveys. One-way ANOVA or t-tests were employed to compare differences in discharge readiness across various demographic characteristics.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!