Introduction: We have previously published about TASER conducted electrical weapons (CEW) compliance with international standards. CEWs deliver electrical pulses that can inhibit a person's neuromuscular control or temporarily incapacitate. An eXperimental Rotating-Field (XRF) waveform CEW and the X2 CEW are new 2-shot electrical weapon models designed to target a precise amount of delivered charge per pulse. They both can deploy 1 or 2 dart pairs, delivered by 2 separate cartridges. Additionally, the XRF controls delivery of incapacitating pulses over 4 field vectors, in a rotating sequence. As in our previous study, we were motivated by the need to understand the cardiac safety profile of these new CEWs. The goal of this paper is to analyze the nominal electrical outputs of TASER XRF and X2 CEWs in reference to provisions of all relevant international standards that specify safety requirements for electrical medical devices and electrical fences. Although these standards do not specifically mention CEWs, they are the closest electrical safety standards and hence give very relevant guidance.
Methods: The outputs of several TASER XRF and X2 CEWs were measured under normal operating conditions. The measurements were compared against manufacturer specifications. CEWs electrical output parameters were reviewed against relevant safety requirements of UL 69, IEC 60335-2-76 Ed 2.1, IEC 60479-1, IEC 60479-2, AS/NZS 60479.1, AS/NZS 60479.2, IEC 60601-1 and BS EN 60601-1.
Results And Conclusion: Our study confirmed that the nominal electrical outputs of TASER XRF and X2 CEWs lie within safety bounds specified by relevant standards.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037288 | DOI Listing |
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
November 2021
Introduction: A Conducted Electrical Weapon (CEW) deploys 2, or more, probes to conduct current via the body to induce motor-nerve mediated muscle contractions, but the inter-probe resistances can vary and this can affect charge delivery. For this reason, newer generation CEWs such as the TASER X3, X2 and X26P models have feed-forward control circuits to keep the delivered charge constant regardless of impedance. Our main goal was to explore the load limits for this "charge metering" system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Human electronic control with the Conducted Electrical Weapon (CEW) has gained widespread acceptance as the preferred law enforcement force option technology due to its dramatic injury and fatal shooting reduction. However, with bulky or baggy clothing, a CEW probe may fail to make direct skin contact and thus arcing is critical to complete the circuit. The goal of the study was to evaluate the ability of modern CEWs to deliver their pulse charges across typical required arcing distances.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnnu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
July 2017
Introduction: The TASER conducted electrical weapon (CEW) delivers electrical pulses that can temporarily incapacitate subjects. For existing CEW models, we have previously presented the distribution of currents in tissues posterior to the sternum and their likelihood of triggering cardiac arrhythmias. New models, the eXperimental Rotating-Field (XRF) waveform CEW (in development) and the X2 CEW (released) have not been investigated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnnu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
July 2017
Introduction: We have previously published about TASER conducted electrical weapons (CEW) compliance with international standards. CEWs deliver electrical pulses that can inhibit a person's neuromuscular control or temporarily incapacitate. An eXperimental Rotating-Field (XRF) waveform CEW and the X2 CEW are new 2-shot electrical weapon models designed to target a precise amount of delivered charge per pulse.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnnu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
August 2015
Introduction: The ubiquitous electric fence is essential to modern agriculture and has saved lives by reducing the number of livestock automobile collisions. Modern safety standards such as IEC 60335-2-76 and UL 69 have played a role in this positive result. However, these standards are essentially based on energy and power (RMS current), which have limited direct relationship to cardiac effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!