Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.

Ann Intern Med

From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California.

Published: October 2017

Background: Fecal immunochemical testing is the most commonly used method for colorectal cancer screening worldwide. However, its effectiveness is frequently undermined by failure to obtain follow-up colonoscopy after positive test results.

Purpose: To evaluate interventions to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy for adults after a positive result on a fecal test (guaiac or immunochemical).

Data Sources: English-language studies from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase from database inception through June 2017.

Study Selection: Randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting an intervention for colonoscopy follow-up of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal test results.

Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and ranked study quality; 2 rated overall strength of evidence for each category of study type.

Data Synthesis: Twenty-three studies were eligible for analysis, including 7 randomized and 16 nonrandomized studies. Three were at low risk of bias. Eleven studies described patient-level interventions (changes to invitation, provision of results or follow-up appointments, and patient navigators), 5 provider-level interventions (reminders or performance data), and 7 system-level interventions (automated referral, precolonoscopy telephone calls, patient registries, and quality improvement efforts). Moderate evidence supported patient navigators and provider reminders or performance data. Evidence for system-level interventions was low. Seventeen studies reported the proportion of test-positive patients who completed colonoscopy compared with a control population, with absolute differences of -7.4 percentage points (95% CI, -19 to 4.3 percentage points) to 25 percentage points (CI, 14 to 35 percentage points).

Limitation: More than half of studies were at high or very high risk of bias; heterogeneous study designs and characteristics precluded meta-analysis.

Conclusion: Patient navigators and giving providers reminders or performance data may help improve colonoscopy rates of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal blood test results. Current evidence about useful system-level interventions is scant and insufficient.

Primary Funding Source: National Cancer Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42016048286).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178946PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M17-1361DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive fecal
12
adults positive
12
patient navigators
12
reminders performance
12
performance data
12
system-level interventions
12
percentage points
12
interventions improve
8
fecal blood
8
follow-up colonoscopy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!