Long-term outcomes after hand-sewn versus circular-stapled (25 and 29 mm) anastomotic technique after esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer.

Background: Anastomotic stricture following esophagogastrectomy (EG) can lead to significant dysphagia, necessitating interventions such as endoscopic dilatation. These post-operative complications gain importance with the increased survival rate of patients after EG. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of both circular-stapled (CS: 25 and 29 mm) and hand-sewn (HS) anastomoses after EG.

Methods: We reviewed prospectively accrued data from December 2004 to December 2014 identifying all patients undergoing EG for esophageal cancer. Immediate post-operative and long-term complications were noted. Primary outcome measures included anastomotic leak and stricture, dysphagia, and subsequent.

Results: A total of 142 patients were identified for analysis. The method used for reconstruction was noted: CS-EEA-25 mm (n = 30), CS-EEA-29 mm (n = 30), and HS (n = 82). Demographics, tumor pathology, and tumor locations were similar in each group. All groups experienced similar rates of anastomotic leak, stricture, and dysphagia. Furthermore, post-operative dilations for symptomatic dysphagia were required in 3 (10%), 4 (13%), and 9 (11%) patients, P = 0.91.

Conclusion: In this cohort, the method of anastomotic construction had no bearing on the rate of complications after EG for the treatment of esophageal cancer. Furthermore, long-term need for dilations for symptomatic dysphagia was equal among all groups.