Immediate coronary angiography in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without obvious extracardiac cause: Who benefits?

Background: Immediate coronary angiography (iCA) and primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (pPCI) in patients successfully resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of suspected cardiac cause is controversial. Our aims were to assess the results of iCA, the prognostic impact of pPCI after OHCA, and to identify subgroups most likely to benefit from this strategy.

Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, patients aged ≥18 years with sustained return of spontaneous circulation after OHCA and no evidence of a non-cardiac cause underwent routine iCA at admission, with pPCI if indicated. Results of iCA, and factors associated with in-hospital survival were analysed.

Results: Between 2006 and 2013, 160 survivors from OHCA presumed of cardiac origin were included (median age, 60 years; 85% males). iCA showed significant coronary-artery lesions in 75% of patients, and acute occlusion or unstable lesion in only 41%. pPCI was performed in 34% of patients and was not associated with survival by univariate or multivariate analysis (P=0.67). ST-segment elevation predicted acute coronary occlusion in 40%. An initial shockable rhythm was associated with higher in-hospital survival (52% vs. 19%; P<0.001). After initial defibrillation, the first rhythm recorded by 12-lead electrocardiography was highly associated with prognosis: secondary asystole had a very low survival rate (5%, 1/21) despite PCI in 43% of patients, compared to sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (42%, 15/36) and supraventricular rhythm (71%, 50/70) (P<0.001).

Conclusions: In our experience, the prevalence of acute coronary occlusion or unstable lesion immediately after OHCA of likely cardiac cause is only 41%. Immediate CA in OHCA survivors, with pPCI if indicated, should be restricted to highly selected patients.