A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cell response of flexible PMMA-derivatives: supremacy of surface chemistry over substrate stiffness. | LitMetric

Cell response of flexible PMMA-derivatives: supremacy of surface chemistry over substrate stiffness.

J Mater Sci Mater Med

Polymer Chemistry & Biomaterials Group, Centre of Macromolecular Chemistry (CMaC), Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S4-Bis, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Published: October 2017

The present work reports on the development of a range of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene glycol) (PMMAPEG)-based materials, characterized by different elasticity moduli in order to study the influence of the substrate's mechanical properties on the response of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). To render the selected materials cell-interactive, a polydopamine (PDA)/gelatin type B (Gel B) coating was applied. Prior to the in vitro assay, the success of the PDA and Gel B immobilization onto the materials was confirmed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) as reflected by the nitrogen percentages measured for the materials after PDA and Gel B deposition. Tensile tests showed that materials with E-moduli ranging from 37 to 1542 MPa could be obtained by varying the ratio between PMMA and PEG as well as the PEG molecular weight and its functionality (i.e. mono-methacrylate vs. di-methacrylate). The results after 1 day of cell contact suggested a preferred HUVECs cell growth onto more rigid materials. After 1 week, the material with the lowest E-modulus of 37 MPa showed lower cell densities compared to the other materials. No clear correlation could be observed between the number of focal adhesion points and the substrate stiffness. Although minor differences were found, these were not statistically significant. This last conclusion again highlights the universal character of the PDA/Gel B modification. The present work could thus be valuable for the development of a range of cell substrates requiring different mechanical properties in line with the envisaged application while the cell response should ideally remain unaffected.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5994-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cell response
8
substrate stiffness
8
development range
8
mechanical properties
8
pda gel
8
materials
7
cell
6
response flexible
4
flexible pmma-derivatives
4
pmma-derivatives supremacy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!