A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Follow-up of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Need for Routinary Assessment of Acid Gastroesophageal Reflux with pH-metry. | LitMetric

Follow-up of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Need for Routinary Assessment of Acid Gastroesophageal Reflux with pH-metry.

Eur J Pediatr Surg

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Published: December 2018

Introduction:  We aim to assess gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients treated for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and to determine whether a pH-metry investigation should be routinely performed in follow-up.

Materials And Methods:  Twenty-four-hour pH-metry at 1 year was performed in all patients treated for CDH between January 2014 and April 2015 (Group 1). We compared pH-metry results to those of two other groups: children treated for esophageal atresia (EA) (Group 2) and normal babies presenting with typical symptoms (Group 3). All the pH-metric findings were analyzed and compared. Intra-group analysis was performed in Group 1.

Results:  Group 1 consisted of 21, Group 2 of 24, and Group 3 of 21 patients. Mean pH-metry values for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were, respectively: reflux index (RI) 4.3, 5.1, and 3.9; total number of refluxes (NR) 79.5, 88.8, and 88.7; refluxes longer than 5' ( > 5) 1.7, 2.3, and 1.47; and longest reflux episode (LR) 11.4, 13.3, and 8.6. No significant differences were found between Group 1 and the others. Only two CDH patients presented with GER-related symptoms. Patch was associated with significantly higher RI (8.5 vs. 2.98,  = 0.03). The worse was the defect, the worse were the pH-metric results (RI: A3.09, B3.15, and C9.1).

Conclusion:  We believe that a routine GER assessment should be performed in all CDH patients regardless the presence of symptoms.

Level Of Evidence:  This is a Level II study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607290DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

congenital diaphragmatic
8
diaphragmatic hernia
8
gastroesophageal reflux
8
patients treated
8
cdh patients
8
group
7
ph-metry
5
patients
5
follow-up congenital
4
hernia routinary
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!