Background: Medical futility is a key bioethical concern. In Taiwan, policymakers tend to provide care standards and evaluation guidelines for critically ill and terminal patients whose treatment is medically futile. However, the current status of medical futility for critically ill patients is inadequate, and no consensus currently exists on the definition of medical futility.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to understand the medical futility experiences of intensive care nurses.
Methods: This qualitative research adopted a phenomenological perspective and was conducted in a medical center and a regional hospital in Central Taiwan. Eight nurses with at least 1 year of nursing tenure who were serving in the intensive care unit were recruited. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used to conduct one-on-one in-depth interviews. Each of the tape-recorded interviews was transcribed before data analysis.
Results: The research results found four themes, including (a) definitions of medical futility and types of patients, (b) considerations of medical futility, (c) the occurrence of medical futility, and (d) nurses' responses to medical futility. The participants indicated that medical futility refers to the point at which the continued provision of treatment does not evidently ease the disease condition of a patient or improve his or her quality of life or when life-sustaining treatment is provided to patients to facilitate the process of death.
Conclusions: This study revealed that the major challenge in clinical cases of medical futility is for physicians, nurses, and patients to communicate effectively together during times of rapid and unanticipated change in patient condition. Thus, events of medical futility may be preventable. Past cases of medical futility involving critically ill patients may serve as references for guiding clinical care, education, and related policy formulation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000221 | DOI Listing |
Neurocrit Care
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the older adult population, and palliative care consultation can assist in goals-of-care discussions. However, patterns of hospital care delivered before consultation are understudied for older adult patients with TBI. The objective of this study was to identify demographic and clinical drivers of preconsultation care intensity in this population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, University & Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Background: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedures are rapidly expanding, necessitating a more extensive stratification of patients with aortic stenosis. Especially in the high-risk group, some patients fail to derive optimal or any benefits from TAVI, leading to the risk of futile interventions. Despite consensus among several experts regarding the importance of recognizing and anticipating such interventions, the definition, and predictive criteria for futility in TAVI remain ambiguous.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEuroIntervention
January 2025
Department of Cardiac-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
This clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions was developed in association with the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery. It aims to define procedural and contemporary technical requirements that may improve the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), both in the acute phase and at long-term follow-up, in a high-risk cohort of patients on optimal medical therapy when clinical and anatomical high-risk criteria are present that entail unacceptable surgical risks, precluding the feasibility of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This document pertains to patients with surgical contraindication according to the Heart Team, in whom medical therapy has failed (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Trauma Acute Care Surg
January 2025
From the Department of Surgery (J.-M.V., T.W.C., B.A.C.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Epidemiology (B.L.R.-R., S.R.W.) and Department of Surgery (J.W.C.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Donald D. Trunkey Center for Civilian and Combat Casualty Care (M.A.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Surgery, Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health (E.E.M.), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado; Department of Surgery (N.N.), University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida; and Department of Surgery (J.L.S.), Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Background: Blood shortages and utilization stewardship have motivated the trauma community to evaluate futility cutoffs during massive transfusions (MTs). Recent single-center studies have confirmed meaningful survival in ultra-MT (≥20 U) and super-MT (≥50 U), while others advocate for earlier futility cut points. We sought to evaluate whether transfusion volume and intensity cut points could predict 100% mortality in a multicenter analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Vet Med Assoc
January 2025
3Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Objective: To document veterinary technicians' (VTs') experiences with medical futility and its subsequent impact on moral distress and attrition from the profession.
Methods: A cross-sectional study using a 56-question web-based, confidential and anonymous survey was distributed through the National Association of Veterinary Technicians in America between January 19 and February 15, 2023.
Results: There were 1,944 responses from approximately 8,500 members (22% response rate).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!