Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and outcomes of laparoscopic splenic vessel preservation (Lap-SVP) to those of laparoscopic Warshaw technique (Lap-WT).

Materials And Methods: Fourteen patients underwent Lap-SVP and 5 patients underwent Lap-WT. Their clinical data and outcomes of the 2 procedures were compared.

Results: The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, clinically relevant pancreatic fistula, and the rate of splenic infarction were significantly higher in the patients who underwent Lap-WT than in those who underwent Lap-SVP. In both groups, the platelet count ratio and splenic volume ratio at 1 month after the operation did not differ from the preoperative values. Two patients in the Lap-WT group experienced splenic infarction, and could be observed without any treatment.

Conclusions: The long-term outcome of Lap-WT was relevant. Therefore, Lap-WT could be a treatment option for patients who may not have undergone Lap-SVP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000484DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients underwent
12
long-term outcome
8
warshaw technique
8
underwent lap-svp
8
underwent lap-wt
8
splenic infarction
8
patients
5
lap-wt
5
perioperative long-term
4
outcome warshaw
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!