Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Surgery for the primary tumor in metastatic breast cancer is usually not recommended, assuming that local therapy provides no advantage. Recent reports suggest a survival improvement after locoregional treatment, but this is still controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of locoregional treatment in primary metastatic breast cancer and to determine associated factors.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 39 women with de-novo metastatic breast cancer at La Paz University Hospital, from January 2012 to June 2016, grouped by locoregional treatment (n=23) or not (n=16). Multivariate assessment of prognostic factors was performed using Cox regression analysis.
Results: Mean tumor size was 6 cm. Eighteen patients (46.2%) had multifocal tumors, 29 (74.4%) multicentric and 10 (25.7%) bilateral breast cancer. Eighteen patients (46.2%) had an oligometastatic disease and 21 (53.8%) multiorgan metastatic disease. The average time from diagnosis to surgery was 7.7 months, without delay in the start of systemic treatment compared to the no-surgery group. The main surgical procedure was mastectomy in 18 (78.3%) patients. Half of the patients survived 48 months (95% CI: 39-57). In the multivariate analysis, we have not detailed differences in survival by age, chemotherapy, neoadjuvancy, number of systemic treatment lines, radiotherapy, and tumor histology or grade. However, surgery (HR=0.2; 95% CI: 0.07-0.57) and high tumor burden (HR=2.96, 95% CI: 1.23-7.13) have acted as a protective and a risk factor respectively.
Conclusions: Our cohort supports that locoregional treatment in selected patients with de-novo MBC significantly improved survival, so it might be considered in combination with systemic therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04097-7 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!