AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to understand how Turkey's malpractice system affects cardiologists' practices and their views on a new patient compensation system.
  • Out of 253 cardiologists surveyed, a significant portion admitted changing their clinical behavior due to fear of lawsuits, leading to unnecessary tests and avoidance of high-risk patients.
  • Most cardiologists expressed a preference for the proposed compensation system over the current malpractice system, indicating a desire for a change in how patient compensation is handled.

Article Abstract

Objective: Cardiologists participate in the diagnosis and interventional treatment of numerous high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to investigate how the current malpractice system in Turkey influences cardiologists' diagnostic and interventional behavior and to obtain their opinions about an alternative patient compensation system.

Methods: The present cross-sectional study assessed the practice of defensive medicine among cardiologists who are actively working in various types of workplace within the Turkish healthcare system. A 24-item questionnaire was distributed to cardiology residents, specialists, and academics in Turkey in print format, by electronic mail, or via cell phone message.

Results: A total of 253 cardiologists responded to the survey. Among them, 29 (11.6%) had been sued for malpractice claims in the past. Of the cardiologists who had been sued, 2 (6.9%) had been ordered to pay financial compensation, and 1 (3.4%) was given a sentence of imprisonment due to negligence. In all, 132 (52.8%) of the surveyed cardiologists reported that they had changed their practices due to fear of litigation, and 232 (92.8%) reported that they would prefer the new proposed patient compensation system to the current malpractice system. Among the cardiologists surveyed, 78.8% indicated that malpractice fear had affected their decision-making with regard to requesting computed tomography angiography or thallium scintigraphy, 71.6% for coronary angiography, 20% for stent implantation, and 83.2% for avoiding treating high-risk patients.

Conclusion: The results of this survey demonstrated that cardiologists may request unnecessary tests and perform unneeded interventions due to the fear of malpractice litigation fear. Many also avoid high-risk patients and interventions. The majority indicated that they would prefer the proposed alternative patient compensation system to the current malpractice system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2017.39455DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

current malpractice
16
malpractice system
16
patient compensation
16
alternative patient
12
compensation system
12
cardiologists
8
system
8
high-risk patients
8
prefer proposed
8
system current
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!