Pressure ulcers in critically ill patients - Preventable by non-sedation? A substudy of the NONSEDA-trial.

Intensive Crit Care Nurs

Department of Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

Published: February 2018

Objective: Pressure ulcers still pose a significant clinical challenge to critically ill patients. This study is a substudy of the multicenter NONSEDA-trial, where critically ill patients were randomised to sedation or non-sedation during mechanical ventilation. The objective of this substudy was to assess if non-sedation affected the occurrence of pressure ulcers.

Design: Retrospective assessment of data from a single NONSEDA-trial site.

Setting: Mixed intensive care unit.

Outcome Measures: The occurrence of pressure ulcers, described by grade and location.

Results: 205 patients were included. Patients with pressure ulcers in the two groups were comparable with regards to baseline data. There were 44 ulcers in 32 patients in the sedated group and 31 ulcers in 25 patients in the non-sedated group (p=0.08). 64% of the ulcers in sedated patients were located on sacrum and heels, whereas 68% of the ulcers in non-sedated patients were related to equipment (p=0.03).

Conclusions: Non-sedation did not significantly reduce the number of pressure ulcers. Non-sedation significantly affected the location of ulcers: non-sedated patients mainly had ulcers related to equipment, whereas sedated patients mainly had ulcers on the sacrum and heels.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.09.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pressure ulcers
20
critically ill
12
ill patients
12
patients
11
ulcers
11
occurrence pressure
8
ulcers patients
8
sedated patients
8
sacrum heels
8
ulcers non-sedated
8

Similar Publications

Impact of multifaceted interventions on pressure injury prevention: a systematic review.

BMC Nurs

January 2025

Department of Adult Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia.

Background: Pressure injuries are a significant concern in healthcare settings, leading to increased morbidity, healthcare costs, and patient suffering. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of multifaceted interventions on the prevention of Pressure injuries and improvements in nursing practices.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines across multiple databases, including studies from Google Scholar (332), Science Direct (14), grey literature sources (45), PubMed (0), Cochrane Library (437), and Hinari (322).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Stutzerimonas is a recently proposed genus comprising strains formerly classified as Pseudomonas stutzeri. The genus includes at least 16 identified species. Stutzerimonas nitrititolerans, previously known as Pseudomonas nitrititolerans, was initially isolated from a bioreactor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Management of pressure sores can have various environmental effects; moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic notably affected efforts towards effective management of pressure sores. Some cases of COVID-19 infections require long-term hospitalization in the intensive care unit. Moreover, special protective equipment worn by physicians owing to the pandemic complicate wound management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BACKGROUND Terminal ileum (TI) anastomoses present challenges due to anatomical features and pressure from the ileocecal valve (ICV). The use of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is commonly used to treat chronic skin ulcers. Its use for temporary abdominal closure following anastomosis is controversial but has shown promise in patients with inflammatory or vascular disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a risk for amputations, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is explored as a potential treatment to enhance healing and lower amputation rates, although its effectiveness remains debated.
  • A study was conducted with 60 adult patients with DFUs, randomly assigning them to two groups: one receiving HBOT alongside standard wound care (SWC) and the other receiving SWC alone, evaluating various outcomes over four weeks.
  • Results indicated that patients receiving HBOT showed significantly greater improvements in pain, wound size, and healthy tissue formation, as well as a lower incidence of minor amputations compared to those with SWC alone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!