Background: The Open Payments Database (OPD) discloses financial transactions between manufacturers and physicians. The concordance of OPD versus self-reported conflicts of interest (COI) is unknown.

Materials And Methods: Our objectives were to compare (1) industry and self-disclosed COI in clinical literature, (2) payments within each disclosure level, and (3) industry- and self-disclosed COI and payments by specialty. This was an observational study. PubMed was searched for clinical studies accepted for publication from January 2014 to June 2016. Author and OPD-disclosed COIs were compared. Articles and authors were divided into full disclosure, incomplete industry disclosure, incomplete self-disclosure, and no COI. Primary outcome (differences in reported COI per article) was assessed using McNemar's test. Payment differences were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: OPD- and self-disclosed COI differed (65.0% discordance rate by article, P < 0.001). Percentages of authors within each disclosure category differed between specialties (P < 0.001). Hematology articles exhibited the highest discordance rate (79.0%) and received the highest median payment for incomplete self-disclosure ($30,812).

Conclusions: Significant discordance exists between self- and OPD-reported COI. Additional research is needed to determine reasons for these differences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643021PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

self-disclosed coi
12
disclosure incomplete
8
coi
6
discordance conflict
4
conflict interest
4
interest self-disclosure
4
self-disclosure centers
4
centers medicare
4
medicare medicaid
4
medicaid services
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!