Learning the causal relationships that define a molecular system allows us to predict how the system will respond to different interventions. Distinguishing causality from mere association typically requires randomized experiments. Methods for automated  causal discovery from limited experiments exist, but have so far rarely been tested in systems biology applications. In this work, we apply state-of-the art causal discovery methods on a large collection of public mass cytometry data sets, measuring intra-cellular signaling proteins of the human immune system and their response to several perturbations. We show how different experimental conditions can be used to facilitate causal discovery, and apply two fundamental methods that produce context-specific causal predictions. Causal predictions were reproducible across independent data sets from two different studies, but often disagree with the KEGG pathway databases. Within this context, we discuss the caveats we need to overcome for automated causal discovery to become a part of the routine data analysis in systems biology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629212PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08582-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

causal discovery
20
causal relationships
8
causal
8
automated causal
8
mass cytometry
8
cytometry data
8
human immune
8
systems biology
8
data sets
8
causal predictions
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!