Quantification of the probability of reintroduction of IBR in the Netherlands through cattle imports.

Prev Vet Med

GD Animal Health, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, The Netherlands; Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, PO Box 80151, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Published: February 2018

In the Netherlands, the feasibility of a national control program for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) is discussed. The aim of this program would be to achieve freedom from BoHV1 circulation (the causal agent of IBR), in the Dutch cattle population. When IBR would be eradicated, maintaining the free status is essential and insight in the probability of introduction of IBR through cattle imports is crucial. Values for input parameters such as the number of imports per country of origin, herd level prevalence and probability that a random imported animal per age category was either acutely or latently infected with IBR were quantified. A stochastic simulation model was built to predict the basic risk and the efficacy of four risk mitigating scenarios were evaluated. These scenarios involved testing prior to import, import restrictions and vaccination. The model output predicted that IBR infected animals are imported regularly. In an IBR free situation, 571 (5th and 95th percentile: 431-781) cattle herds will be newly infected. Latent infections account for most newly infected herds (77%). When the virus in the imported latently infected animal does not reactivate, subsequent impact of such infections remains limited. The model predicted that most of the herds infected by introduction of acutely infected animals would be veal herds. The scenario in which imports were only allowed from status 9 or 10 countries combined with testing cattle that originated from status 9 countries was most effective in reduction of the import risk to 70 herds per year. The scenario in which vaccination of calves was combined with testing of older cattle was estimated to reduce the number of newly infected herds to 82 per year. The stakeholders classified the latter scenario as most realistic because this scenario was deemed both feasible and rather effective. This study did not evaluate the impact of introduction of IBR in the cattle population, which might differ depending on the type of infection (acute vs. latent) and the herd type in which the virus is introduced. Moreover, when making the final decision about the optimal intervention, the economic perspective should also be taken into account. This study predicted that introduction of IBR will remain a risk for the Dutch cattle population after virus circulation is eliminated from the Netherlands. The import risk is reduced most in scenarios in which testing and vaccination are combined.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.08.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cattle population
12
introduction ibr
12
newly infected
12
ibr
10
cattle
8
cattle imports
8
dutch cattle
8
ibr cattle
8
infected
8
latently infected
8

Similar Publications

East Coast Fever (ECF) is one of the leading causes of livestock mortality and reduced productivity across Eastern Africa, and while a live vaccine against it known as the Infection and Treatment Method has existed for three decades now, its adoption by affected communities remains low. This study sought to provide a detailed examination of the dynamics that shape Infection Treatment Method (ITM) vaccine adoption behaviours. The study examined individual, socio-cultural and ecological- level factors influencing ITM adoption using the socio-ecological model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Performance of weighted genomic BLUP and Bayesian methods for Hanwoo carcass traits.

Trop Anim Health Prod

January 2025

Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 38541, Republic of Korea.

To improve the quality and yield of the Korean beef industry, selection criteria often focus on estimated breeding values for carcass weight (CWT), eye muscle area (EMA), backfat thickness (BF), and marbling score (MS). This study estimated genetic parameters and assessed the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) using SNP weighting methods. We compared the accuracy of these methods with the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and various Bayesian approaches (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC, and BayesCPi) for the specified traits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Optimal embryonic development depends upon cell-signaling molecules released by the maternal reproductive tract called embryokines. Identity of specific embryokines that enhance competence of the embryo for sustained survival is largely lacking. The current objective was to evaluate effects of three putative embryokines in cattle on embryonic development to the blastocyst stage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Identification of chromosomal abnormalities is an important issue in animal breeding and veterinary medicine. Routine cytogenetic diagnosis of domestic animals began in the 1960s with the aim of identifying carriers of centric fusion between chromosome 1 and 29 in cattle. In the 1970s, chromosome banding techniques were introduced, and in the 1980s, the first cytogenomic techniques, based on the development of locus- and chromosome-specific probes, were used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to the efficacy of antimicrobials in humans and animals, including those used to control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in high-risk calves entering western Canadian feedlots. Successful mitigation strategies require an improved understanding of the epidemiology of AMR. Specifically, the relative contributions of antimicrobial use (AMU) and contagious transmission to AMR emergence in animal populations are unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!