AI Article Synopsis
- The sentence in question was supposed to be removed during manuscript proofing.
- It compares the responses of male and female hepatocytes to cotinine, showing they reacted similarly.
- However, it notes that male hepatocytes were more sensitive to certain other substances (chrysene, fluorene, and naphthalene) compared to female hepatocytes.
Article Abstract
During manuscript proofing, the following sentence was not deleted in the section "Results" at the end of the paragraph: "Both male and female hepatocytes responded in a similar fashion to cotinine, whereas male hepatocyte function was more sensitive to chrysene, fluorene and naphthalene than female hepatocytes".
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6828386 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2075-x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
erratum modelling
4
modelling foetal
4
foetal exposure
4
exposure maternal
4
maternal smoking
4
smoking hepatoblasts
4
hepatoblasts pluripotent
4
pluripotent stem
4
stem cells
4
cells manuscript
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!