To characterize determinants of treatment outcome in a real world population of 161 post-menopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with fulvestrant. Descriptive statistics for demographics, anthropometrics, clinical and molecular characteristic were compared across subgroups of sensitivity/resistance to prior endocrine therapy and tested in uni/multivariate models. Clinical benefit was more common in sensitive patients with higher estrogen receptor expression and when fulvestrant was given in first line (=0.02 and 0.046). In resistant patients, PFS was longer with lower BMI (=0.01). Among endocrine sensitive women, longer PFS was associated with fulvestrant in first-line, single metastasis and no visceral involvement (=0.01, 0.003 and 0.01). OS was shorter in resistant patients with HER2-positive disease and if fulvestrant was given in second and subsequent line (=0.03). In sensitive patients, we observed worse OS with multiple metastases (=0.008). Multivariate analyses confirmed longer PFS in resistant patients with lower BMI and older age (=0.002 and 0.007). OS in resistant patients was negatively influenced by HER2 positivity and fulvestrant in second and subsequent line (=0.04). In sensitive women, multiple metastases were associated with poorer survival (=0.002). This evidence encourages considering patient and disease characteristics in decision making and outcome interpretation for patients candidate to fulvestrant.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620318 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16982 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!