Use of very old donors for lung transplantation: a dual-centre retrospective analysis.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), University Hospital of Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Published: December 2017

Objectives: To reduce the shortage of organs for transplantation by expanding organ selection criteria as a means to increase the pool of potential lung donors. In this study, we sought to investigate the impact of using lungs from very old donors aged >70 years on outcomes after lung transplantation.

Methods: Between January 2010 and November 2016, 96 patients with end-stage lung disease underwent lung transplantation in our centres. Lung donors were divided into 3 groups according to age (donor aged <60 years, 60-69 years and ≥70 years). We examined the effect of donor age on various short- and long-term outcome parameters.

Results: Lungs harvested from very old donors had a lower percentage of smoking history and shorter ventilation time. Survival rates of recipients did not show significant differences between older and younger donor groups. Most of the short- and long-term outcome parameters in recipients of lungs from very old donors did not differ significantly among the 3 age groups, except for post-transplant best forced expiratory volume in 1 s and treated acute rejections, which were lower and higher, respectively, in donors aged ≥70 years.

Conclusions: This dual-centre analysis showed that lung transplantation from donors aged ≥70 years was not associated with worse outcomes compared with the younger donors. This study supports the idea that it might be possible to use an extraordinarily cautious selection of lungs from very old donors to increase the pool of suitable donors, given the shortage of suitable organ donors available for lung transplantation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx202DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung transplantation
8
lung donors
8
lung
5
donors
4
donors lung
4
transplantation dual-centre
4
dual-centre retrospective
4
retrospective analysis
4
analysis objectives
4
objectives reduce
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: The progressive decline in interstitial lung disease associated with non-scleroderma connective tissue disease (ILD-NSCTD) is linked to poor prognosis and frequently results in respiratory failure. Lung transplantation (LTx) offers a viable treatment option, yet its outcomes in ILD-NSCTD remain contentious, particularly across different subtypes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n=11,610) and ILD-NSCTD (n=610) listed in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database who underwent lung transplantation between May 5, 2005, and December 31, 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multisociety endorsement of the 2024 European guideline recommendations on coronary revascularization.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

January 2025

Coronary Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart, Vascular, & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multisociety Endorsement of the 2024 European Guideline Recommendations on Coronary Revascularization.

Ann Thorac Surg

January 2025

Coronary Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and death in solid organ transplant recipients. Pre-emptive treatment of patients with CMV viraemia using antiviral agents has been suggested as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2006 and updated in 2013.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on survival in people with Interstitial lung disease.

Chest

January 2025

Respiratory Research@Alfred, Central Clinical School, Monash University, VIC, Australia; Institute for Breathing and Sleep, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, VIC, Australia.

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a beneficial intervention for people with interstitial lung disease (ILD), however the effect of PR on survival is unclear. This study compared the survival outcomes in people with ILD who were allocated to PR versus those who were allocated to control in two published randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Research Question: Does participation in PR impact survival among people with ILD?

Study Design And Methods: The combined data from the two previous RCTs of PR in ILD were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!