The PHAR-IN ("") looked at whether there is a difference in how industrial employees and academics rank competences for practice in the biotechnological industry. A small expert panel consisting of the authors of this paper produced a biotechnology competence framework by drawing up an initial list of competences then ranking them in importance using a three-stage Delphi process. The framework was next evaluated and validated by a large expert panel of academics ( 37) and industrial employees ( = 154). Results show that priorities for industrial employees and academics were similar. The competences for biotechnology practice that received the highest scores were mainly in: "Research and Development", '"Upstream" and "Downstream" Processing', "Product development and formulation", "Aseptic processing", "Analytical methodology", "Product stability", and "Regulation". The main area of disagreement was in the category "Ethics and drug safety" where academics ranked competences higher than did industrial employees.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597173PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy3030101DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

industrial employees
16
competence framework
8
employees academics
8
expert panel
8
industrial
5
european competence
4
framework industrial
4
industrial pharmacy
4
pharmacy practice
4
practice biotechnology
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!