J Urol
Department of Urology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Published: June 1988
Ureteroscopy has been used for the treatment of calculi throughout the ureter. The results of ureteroscopic stone removal were reviewed in 100 patients. Similar results were compared in 30 patients undergoing ureterolithotomy and 32 treated by basket manipulation. Success of ureteroscopic removal was related to the location of the calculus: 50 per cent in the proximal, 80 per cent in the mid and 99 per cent in the distal ureter. Hospital stay, costs and narcotic analgesic use were significantly less for ureteroscopic stone removal than for open surgical lithotomy. The success rate for ureteroscopic removal of distal calculi (99 per cent) was higher than for blind basketing procedures (59 per cent). Ureteroscopy should be considered the technique of choice for the removal of distal ureteral calculi. It is an acceptable alternative for treatment of calculi throughout the urinary tract.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42853-9 | DOI Listing |
Int Braz J Urol
March 2025
Department of Urology, Health Sciences University Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.
Purpose: To compare the external validation of four existing scoring systems for encrusted ureteral stents (EUS) and their relationship with stent indwelling time, stone-free rates, multiple surgery sessions, multimodal procedures, and prolonged operation times exceeding 120 minutes in total.
Materials And Methods: The data of 208 patients who underwent surgery for EUS reviewed. All EUSs were evaluated with 4 scoring systems: ESB (encrusted stone burden), FECal (forgotten, encrusted, calcified), KUB (kidney, ureter and bladder), V-GUES (visual grading for ureteral stone burden).
World J Urol
March 2025
Department of Urology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, India.
Introduction: The use of lasers has created a major impact in the management of stones. The aim of our study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety profile of Thulium fiber laser (TFL) and Holmium: YAG (Ho: YAG) laser in ureteric stones.
Methods: It is a prospective randomized single-centre study carried out from December 2022 to December 2023.
World J Urol
March 2025
Department of Urology, Fondazione Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Background And Objective: The flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) with continuous flow lithotripsy may improve stone-free rates (SFR) in ureterorenolithotripsy procedures, reducing operative time and the need for fragment extraction. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of FANS versus conventional sheaths in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones.
Methods: From January to September 2024, patients undergoing RIRS with high-power pulsed lasers (60 W Ho:YAG or 100 W pTm:YAG) were randomized to receive either a conventional sheath (Group 1) or FANS (Group 2).
Urolithiasis
March 2025
Firat University Medical Faculty, Department for Urology, Elazig, Turkey.
The practice of fluoroscopy during pediatric endoscopic kidney stone procedures requires attention because of radiation concerns that demand new treatment methods. This study aimed to present the multicentric results of single guide wire flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) procedures without fluoroscopy and an ureteral access sheath (UAS) in treating kidney stones in pediatric patients. Moreover, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure to ascertain the feasibility of this radiation-free therapeutic intervention for treating kidney stones in children.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNiger J Clin Pract
December 2024
Department of Urology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Background: Urologists can encounter difficulties when dealing with ureteral stone impaction. However, reliable preoperative indicators of stone impaction are scarce.
Aims: We aimed to determine ureteral wall thickness (UWT) as an independent predictor of intraoperative stone impaction, to detect if any patient or stone-related factors predict impaction and to ascertain whether impaction affected intraoperative/postoperative outcomes.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!
© LitMetric 2025. All rights reserved.