Objectives: The increasing use of multigene panel tests may reveal an unexpected pathogenic variant in the tumor protein p53 () gene among individuals who do not meet clinical criteria for Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Among a registry-based sample of individuals with a pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variant in , we sought to characterize the original clinical context in which genetic testing was performed, the personal and family history and whether they met clinical LFS criteria, and the follow-up care following diagnosis among those in whom this information was available.
Methods: Among individuals with multigene panel testing (inclusive of the gene) who were part of either the Inherited Cancer Registry or the Vanderbilt Hereditary Cancer Registry protocols and were confirmed to have a P/LP variant in , pedigree was reviewed to characterize personal and family history, including original clinical context for genetic testing and whether they met clinical diagnostic criteria for . Subsequent cancer risk management options were documented through information collected in the study questionnaire and medical records.
Results: Among the 10 participants enrolled in one of the two registries with a germline P/LP variant detected through a multigene panel test, the most frequent clinical contexts for testing were genetic risk recognized in the survivorship care setting (50%) and a newly diagnosed breast cancer (40%). No participants met classic LFS diagnostic criteria and 6 of 10 met Chompret criteria (60%) at the time of testing. Among the seven participants in whom results of total body magnetic resonance imaging were available, only three had completely negative findings. The remaining four had findings, three of which were likely benign/incidental requiring additional follow-up, and one was consistent with metastatic disease in the vertebrae.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that individuals identified with a germline P/LP variant in through multigene panel tests have substantial variations in clinical phenotypes not previously recognized when only those with striking family histories suggestive of LFS were tested through targeted testing. The expansion of the clinical phenotype among carriers of a P/LP in in the era of multigene testing should be considered when making cancer risk management recommendations, which were developed based on patients with classic LFS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000711 | DOI Listing |
Gastroenterology
January 2025
Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Stat Med
February 2025
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Multi-gene panel testing allows efficient detection of pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes including moderate-risk genes such as ATM and PALB2. A growing number of studies examine the risk of breast cancer (BC) conferred by pathogenic variants of these genes. A meta-analysis combining the reported risk estimates can provide an overall estimate of age-specific risk of developing BC, that is, penetrance for a gene.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Cardiol
January 2025
Medical Genetics Unit, Romagna Agency of Health, Italy.
Background: non-syndromic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is found to correlate with a genetic cause in 30-40 % of cases. The identification of a causative gene variant can guide treatment options and cascade testing of at-risk family members. Cardiomyopathy multigene panels are routinely used to identify the genetic cause, but often detect variants of uncertain significance (VUS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBreast
January 2025
Medical Genetics Center (MGZ), Bayerstr. 3-5, 80335, Munich, Germany; NASGE, Nationale Allianz für seltene genetische Erkrankungen, Germany; Department of Medicine IV, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Ziemssenstr. 5, 80336, Munich, Germany. Electronic address:
As multigene panel testing is becoming routine in clinical care, there are recommendations at national and international level, as to which genes should be analyzed in the context of a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). However, the individual composition of gene panels offered by testing laboratories vary, resulting in a different variant diagnostic rate. Therefore, we performed a retrospective NGS dataset analysis of suspected HBOC patients who had been tested at different German diagnostic laboratories that are part of the NASGE network.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFS D Med
December 2024
Sanford Health Reproductive Medicine, Fargo, North Dakota.
Background: The following case report details the genetic evaluation and treatment of a 30-year-old male with a history of asthenoteratospermia and notable abnormalities of the sperm flagella.
Methods: Genetic evaluation was performed via a multi-gene panel of genes associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia and multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella (MMAF) prior to the couple's in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle.
Results: Genetic evaluation was performed via a multi-gene panel of genes associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia and multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella (MMAF) prior to the couple's in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!