Objectives: To determine the efficacy of 4 different oral hygiene regimens involving adjunctive interdental cleaning devices in unsupervised young subjects with intact interdental papilla.

Material And Methods: Sixty periodontally healthy subjects were randomly allocated to 4 groups following different oral hygiene regimens (T-7): use of manual toothbrush alone; manual toothbrush plus dental floss; manual toothbrush plus interdental brushes; and manual toothbrush plus rubber interdental picks. Oral hygiene instructions (OHI) were given. One week after (T0), professional supragingival scaling and polishing was performed, and subjects were then reseen every 2 weeks (T14 and T28). At T-7, T0, T14 and T28, full-mouth plaque score (FMPS), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) and angulated bleeding index (AngBI) were taken.

Results: During the first week (T-7/T0 unclean phase), FMPS decreased significantly in all groups except the group using dental floss. At T28, a significant decrease in FMPS (P < .001, all groups) and FMBS (P < .05, all groups except the group using flossing P < .001) was noted. Interdental FMPS showed significantly lower values in subjects treated with interdental brushes or rubber interdental picks vs toothbrushing alone (P < .05). The use of interdental picks was associated with reduced interdental FMBS when compared to flossing (P < .05).

Conclusion: In young subjects, with no interdental attachment loss, toothbrushing or toothbrushing and adjunctive interdental cleaning devices such as dental floss, interdental brushes or interdental rubber picks can significantly reduce both plaque and gingival inflammation. Use of interdental brushes or rubber picks reduces more interdental plaque in comparison with toothbrushing alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12318DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

manual toothbrush
16
oral hygiene
12
young subjects
8
subjects intact
8
hygiene regimens
8
dental floss
8
t14 t28
8
interdental
5
interdental plaque
4
plaque reduction
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: To evaluate the enamel abrasion effects of soft, ultra-soft, and nano-bristle toothbrushes using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to guide toothbrush selection for optimal enamel preservation.

Methods: This in vitro study involved 45 extracted human teeth (central and lateral incisors), randomly assigned to three groups (n=15 each): Group I (nano-bristle), Group II (ultra-soft bristle), and Group III (soft bristle). Each specimen underwent 10,000 brushing cycles with a standardized 2 N force to simulate one year of brushing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical Outcomes After Dental Surgery with Two Antiseptic Protocols.

Dent J (Basel)

November 2024

Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Little has been written in the literature about the clinical comparison between the single use of chlorhexidine (CHX) and its combination with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of two at-home antiseptic regimens. : Healthy subjects scheduled for dental surgery were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate the impact of manual toothbrush usage duration and associated wear on cleaning performance in a tooth model with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Materials And Methods: Black resin teeth with attached brackets were coated with a white layer of titanium dioxide and subjected to brushing using a brushing machine. Two distinct brushing motions, horizontal and circular, were tested.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • An oral irrigator, or dental waterjet (DWJ), is used to remove plaque and improve oral hygiene, particularly in orthodontic patients.
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of seven clinical trials evaluated the effectiveness of DWJ against traditional brushing methods, revealing no significant differences in gum health or plaque removal between DWJ and other tools like automatic or manual toothbrushes.
  • The overall evidence quality was low to very low, suggesting that while DWJ might be a useful tool, it does not significantly outperform traditional oral hygiene methods for orthodontic patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This randomised, single-blind, controlled study aimed to compare daily adjunctive use of an ultrasonic water irrigation device to dental floss in controlling plaque and gingival inflammation in patients with gingivitis.

Methods: Participants were randomly allocated to either daily use of an ultrasonic water irrigator or dental floss as an adjunct to manual toothbrushing for 4 weeks, with periodontal assessment repeated at 1 and 4 weeks after baseline (Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index [PI], Loe and Silness Gingival Index [GI] and bleeding on marginal probing [BOMP]).

Results: Sixty-two participants completed the investigation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!