Reduced Neural Recruitment for Bayesian Adjustment of Inhibitory Control in Methamphetamine Dependence.

Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging

Department of Psychiatry (KMH, MPP); and Department of Cognitive Science (SZ, NM, AJY), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; and Laureate Institute for Brain Research (MPP), Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Published: September 2016

Delineating the processes that contribute to the progression and maintenance of substance dependence is critical to understanding and preventing addiction. Several previous studies have shown inhibitory control deficits in individuals with stimulant use disorder. We used a Bayesian computational approach to examine potential neural deficiencies in the dynamic predictive processing underlying inhibitory function among recently abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals (MDIs), a population at high risk of relapse. Sixty-two MDIs were recruited from a 28-day inpatient treatment program at the San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center and compared with 34 healthy control subjects. They completed a stop-signal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. A Bayesian ideal observer model was used to predict individuals' trial-to-trial probabilistic expectations of inhibitory response, P(stop), to identify group differences specific to Bayesian expectation and prediction error computation. Relative to control subjects, MDIs were more likely to make stop errors on difficult trials and had attenuated slowing following stop errors. MDIs further exhibited reduced sensitivity as measured by the neural tracking of a Bayesian measure of surprise (unsigned prediction error), which was evident across all trials in the left posterior caudate and orbitofrontal cortex (Brodmann area 11), and selectively on stop error trials in the right thalamus and inferior parietal lobule. MDIs are less sensitive to surprising task events, both across trials and upon making commission errors, which may help explain why these individuals may not engage in switching strategy when the environment changes, leading to adverse consequences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621759PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.06.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inhibitory control
8
control subjects
8
prediction error
8
bayesian
5
mdis
5
reduced neural
4
neural recruitment
4
recruitment bayesian
4
bayesian adjustment
4
inhibitory
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!