Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: The purpose of this study in animals was to evaluate the peri-implant bone repair against systemic administration of the antineoplastic agent.
Material And Methods: We used 84 male rats (Rattus norvegicus, albinus, Wistar), divided into two groups: cisplatin (CIS) and saline solution (SS). The titanium implants were inserted into the right tibia at day 0 in all animals from both groups. Group SS received SS intraperitoneally at 15 and 17 days postoperatively. Group CIS received 5 and 2.5 mg/kg of CIS intraperitoneally at 15 and 17 days postoperatively, respectively. Euthanasia was performed at 22, 30 and 60 days postoperatively. Twenty-four undecalcified specimens were prepared for histometric analysis of bone/implant contact (BIC). Sixty specimens were selected to bone area (BA) measurement, histological analysis and immunohistochemical analysis of RUNX-2, osteocalcin (OCN) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP). BIC and BA were considered to be the primary outcome parameters.
Results: Group CIS showed lower BIC (11.87 ± 0.97 mm; 19.19 ± 0.8 mm; 17.69 ± 1.05 mm; p ≤ .05) and BA (3.68 ± 1.29 mm ; 3.05 ± 0.88 mm ; 3.23 ± 0.67 mm ; p ≤ .05), as well as decreased number of RUNX-2 (102.8 ± 27.35 cells/mm ; 100.04 ± 8.61 cells/mm ; 118.82 ± 21.38 cells/mm ; p ≤ .05)- and OCN-positive cells (120 ± 24.5 cells/mm ; 102 ± 27.73 cells/mm ; 100 ± 14.23 cells/mm ; p ≤ .05) at 22, 30 and 60 days, respectively. The animals in group CIS also showed increased number of TRAP-positive cells (86.8 ± 6.37 cells/mm ; 71.5 ± 4.72 cells/mm ; 92.8 ± 9.52 cells/mm ; p ≤ .05) and a persistent and exacerbated inflammatory response in all experimental periods.
Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that the chemotherapeutic CIS negatively affects the bone repair at peri-implant areas, jeopardizing the osseointegration of titanium implants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12824 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!