Background: For several decades, Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to monitor corticospinal excitability (CSE) changes in various contexts. Habitually, single-coil TMS is applied over one primary motor cortex (M1), eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a contralateral limb muscle, usually a hand effector. However, in many situations, it would be useful to obtain MEPs in both hands simultaneously, to track CSE bilaterally. Such an approach requires stimulating both M1 concurrently while avoiding interference between the two descending stimuli.
New Method: We examined MEPs obtained at rest using a double-coil TMS approach where the two M1 are stimulated with a 1ms inter-pulse interval (double-coil). MEPs were acquired using double-coil (MEP) or single-coil (MEP) TMS, at five different intensities of stimulation (100, 115, 130, 145 or 160% of the resting motor threshold, rMT). Given the 1ms inter-pulse interval in double-coil trials, MEP were either evoked by a 1st (MEP) or a 2nd (MEP) TMS pulse.
Results: All MEP (MEP=MEP, MEP and MEP) were equivalent, regardless of the hand within which they were elicited, the intensity of stimulation or the pulse order.
Comparison With Existing Method: This method allows one to observe state-related CSE changes for the two hands simultaneously on a trial-by-trial basis.
Conclusion: These results infer the absence of any neural interactions between the two cortico-spinal volleys with double-coil TMS. Hence, this technique can be reliably used to assess CSE bilaterally, opening new research perspectives for scientists interested in physiological markers of activity in the motor output system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.09.016 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Advanced TMS approaches to probe corticospinal excitability during action preparation.
Neuroimage
June 2020
CoActions Lab, Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
The motor system displays strong changes in neural activity during action preparation. In the past decades, several techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have allowed us to gain insights into the functional role of such preparatory activity in humans. More recently, new TMS tools have been proposed to study the mechanistic principles underlying the changes in corticospinal excitability during action preparation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPreparatory inhibition: Impact of choice in reaction time tasks.
Neuropsychologia
June 2019
Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory for Experimental Psychopathology, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
By applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in muscles of the contralateral hand during reaction time (RT) tasks, many studies have reported a strong global suppression of motor excitability during action preparation, a phenomenon called preparatory inhibition. Several hypotheses have been put forward regarding the role of this broad suppression, with the predominant view that it reflects inhibitory processes assisting action selection. However, this assumption is still a matter of debate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInvestigating the effect of anticipating a startling acoustic stimulus on preparatory inhibition.
Neurophysiol Clin
April 2019
Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier, COSY- B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Objectives: Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) show a profound suppression when elicited during the instructed-delay of reaction time (RT) tasks. One predominant hypothesis is that this phenomenon, called "preparatory inhibition", reflects the operation of processes that suppress motor activity to withhold prepared (but delayed) responses, a form of impulse control. In addition, a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) - a loud and narrow sound - can trigger the release of prepared responses in RT tasks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUsing a Double-Coil TMS Protocol to Assess Preparatory Inhibition Bilaterally.
Front Neurosci
March 2018
Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), elicits motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in contralateral limb muscles which are valuable indicators of corticospinal excitability (CSE) at the time of stimulation. So far, most studies have used single-coil TMS over one M1, yielding MEPs in muscles of a single limb-usually the hand. However, tracking CSE in the two hands simultaneously would be useful in many contexts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAssessing cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): A systematic review.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
March 2018
Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia; Deakin Child Study Centre, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
The inhibitory tone that the cerebellum exerts on the primary motor cortex (M1) is known as cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI). Studies show CBI to be relevant to several motor functions, including adaptive motor learning and muscle control. CBI can be assessed noninvasively via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using a double-coil protocol.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!