A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Measuring the patient perspective on latissimus dorsi donor site outcomes following breast reconstruction. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed long-term donor site outcomes of latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction, as prior data was limited and lacked patient-reported outcome measures.
  • Researchers recruited a group of breast cancer patients across 270 UK hospitals, sending them an 18-month follow-up questionnaire to evaluate aesthetic and functional concerns at the donor site, refining two new scales through psychometric testing.
  • Findings showed that 78% of patients reported no significant aesthetic issues, while 60% had functional concerns; the study highlighted that completely autologous procedures led to more bother compared to implant coverage, and complications influenced aesthetic bother levels.

Article Abstract

Background: There is little evidence about the long-term donor site outcome of latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and no patient-reported outcome measures designed specifically for the procedure.

Methods: A prospective cohort of breast cancer patients having latissimus dorsi reconstruction after a mastectomy was recruited from 270 hospitals in the United Kingdom. An 18-month follow up questionnaire containing two novel scales was sent to consenting patients. The prevalence of aesthetic and functional morbidity at the donor site was described. The two new scales were refined using the Rasch measurement model and subsequently validated.

Results: 1,096 women completed the new scales. 78% of patients reported that no back appearance issues had bothered them "most of the time" or "all of the time" in the past two weeks. The equivalent figure for functional morbidity was 60%. Four items were eliminated following initial psychometric testing. This produced an 8-item Back Appearance scale and an 11-item Back and Shoulder Function scale. Both scales showed adequate fit to the Rasch measurement model. Higher levels of aesthetic and functional bother were observed for completely autologous procedures versus those where latissimus dorsi reconstruction was used to cover an implant (p <0.05). Higher levels of aesthetic bother were observed in women who had suffered a perioperative complication at the donor site (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: These results can inform patients of the morbidity associated with latissimus dorsi reconstruction. The new scales can be used to compare groups undergoing different variations of the procedure and to monitor individual patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

latissimus dorsi
16
donor site
12
breast reconstruction
8
dorsi reconstruction
8
aesthetic functional
8
functional morbidity
8
rasch measurement
8
measurement model
8
measuring patient
4
patient perspective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!