Objectives: Performance of a superpower bone-anchored hearing aid (Baha), the Baha Cordelle from Cochlear Bone-Anchored Solutions (BCD1), was compared to its successor, the Baha 5 SuperPower (BCD2).
Design: A comparative study in which each patient served as its own control.
Setting: Tertiary clinic.
Participants: Ten experienced BCD1 users with profound mixed hearing loss. For comparison, data from another study with 10 experienced users with a severe mixed hearing loss using a Cochlear Baha 5 power sound processor (BCD-P) were included.
Main Outcome Measures: Speech reception thresholds in noise and APHAB and SSQ questionnaires.
Results: Speech reception thresholds for the digits-in-noise (DIN) test were significantly lower (P < 5%), that is more favourable, for BCD2 in the speech and noise frontal condition and in the speech frontal and noise contralateral condition than for BCD1. For the group with severe mixed loss fitted with BCD-P, the SRTs were not significantly different (P > 5%) from the BCD2 values. With the APHAB questionnaire scores were significantly lower, that is more favourable, for the ease of communication (P < 5%) and the background noise (P < 1%) domains for BCD2 than for BCD1. APHAB scores for the aversiveness of loud sounds domain were not significantly different for both devices (P > 5%). Scores for the speech and quality domains of the SSQ questionnaire were significantly higher, that is more favourable, for BCD2 than for BCD1. APHAB and SSQ scores for BCD-P were not significantly different from those for BCD2 (P > 5%).
Conclusions: Data for BCD2 in profound mixed loss are similar to those for BCD-P and a severe mixed loss. Of 10 patients, 2 expressed a strong preference for BCD2 over BCD1, and 7 patients had a preference for BCD2 over BCD1. One patient preferred BCD1 because of its built-in telecoil facility.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/coa.12989 | DOI Listing |
Introduction: This study aims to investigate the impact of auditory input on postural control in young adult cochlear implant users with profound sensorineural hearing loss. The research explores the relationship between auditory cues and static postural stability in individuals with hearing impairment.
Methods: 34 young adult cochlear implant users, consisting of 15 males and 19 females aged 18-35 years, underwent various balance tests, including the modified Clinical Tests of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) and the Unilateral Stance Test (UST), under different auditory conditions: (1) White noise stimulus present with the sound processor activated, (2) Ambient noise present with the sound processor activated, and (3) Sound processor deactivated.
Commun Med (Lond)
January 2025
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH, Fürstenweg 77a, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Background: Cochlear implants (CIs) are neuroprosthetic devices which restore hearing in severe-to-profound hearing loss through electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Current CIs use an externally worn audio processor. A long-term goal in the field has been to develop a device in which all components are contained within a single implant.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosci
December 2024
Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, Stadtfelddamm 34, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Ear Nose Throat J
November 2024
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Cochlear implant (CI) users face the decision of whether to upgrade to a new sound processor (SP) with technological advances. We wanted to assess the changes of speech perception ability and aided hearing thresholds as well as subjective satisfaction after upgrade to a new SP. Fifty-five patients who have used CI for 10 years or more and upgraded to a new SP were enrolled.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!