AI Article Synopsis

  • Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) is typically treated with corticosteroids, but this study compares the effectiveness of clarithromycin (CAM) versus prednisone (PRE) in patients without respiratory failure.
  • Over 15 years, 40 patients received CAM and 22 received PRE, with similar clinical presentations but notable differences in treatment response and side effects.
  • CAM showed a better tolerance and fewer relapses (10% vs. 54.5%) compared to PRE, suggesting it's a viable alternative for patients with normal pulmonary function, although not effective for everyone.

Article Abstract

Background: Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) is a clinicopathological syndrome of unknown origin. Corticosteroids are the standard treatment, but clarithromycin (CAM) is also effective. The aim of this observational retrospective study was to compare the results of CAM versus prednisone (PRE) treatment in patients with biopsy-proven OP without respiratory insufficiency.

Material And Methods: In a 15-year period, 40 patients were treated with CAM (500 mg twice daily orally for 3 months) and 22 with PRE (mean initial dose of 0.67 ± 0.24 mg/kg/d for a mean of 8.59 ± 3.05 months).

Results: The clinical presentation, laboratory, and radiological findings did not differ markedly between patients treated with CAM and PRE, with the exception of a higher frequency of sweats (55% vs. 23%; p < 0.015), ground glass opacities (95% vs. 50%; p <0.0001) and nodular lesions (45% vs. 18%; p = 0.036) in the CAM group. A complete response was achieved in 35(88%) patients treated with CAM and in all treated with PRE. Patients treated with PRE relapsed more frequently than those treated with CAM (54.5% vs. 10%; p < 0.0001). Corticosteroid-related adverse events were noticed in 8(6.5%) patients (with one death), but CAM caused only one (2.5%) allergic reaction. A FVC >80% identified patients who might be successfully treated with CAM with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 88.57% (AUC 0.869; 95% CI 0.684-1; p = 0.008); the figures for the FEV1 were >70%, a sensitivity of 60%, and a specificity of 91.43% (AUC 0.809; 95%CI 0.609-1; p = 0.027).

Conclusions: CAM can be used to treat COP patients in whom the pulmonary function parameters are within normal limits. Such therapy is shorter, better tolerated, and associated with fewer adverse events and relapses than is PRE. However, the therapy is ineffective in some patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612459PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184739PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients treated
12
treated cam
12
cryptogenic organizing
8
treatment clarithromycin
8
sensitivity 60%
8
60% specificity
8
cam
6
patients
6
organizing pneumonia-results
4
pneumonia-results treatment
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!