We examine the feasibility of phytoremediation as an alternative strategy to limit the exposure of asbestos in site with asbestos-containing materials. We collected soils from four locations from two sites-one with naturally occurring asbestos, and another, a superfund site, where asbestos-containing materials were disposed over decades-and performed ecotoxicology tests. We also performed two experiments with crop cultivar and two grasses from serpentine ecotype and cultivar to determined best choice for phytoremediation. Asbestos concentrations in different size fractions of soils varied by orders of magnitude. However, different asbestos concentrations had little effect on germination and root growth. Presence of co-contaminants such as heavy metals and lack of nutrients affected plant growth to different extents, indicating that several of these limiting factors should be considered instead of the primary contaminant of concern. Crop cultivar survived on asbestos-contaminated soil. Grasses from serpentine ecotype did not show higher biomass than the cultivar. Overall, these results showed that soil conditions play a critical role in screening different crop species for phytoremediation and that asbestos concentration has limited to no effect on plant growth. Our study provided a framework for phytoremediation of asbestos-contaminated sites to limit long-term asbestos exposure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769457 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0177-x | DOI Listing |
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
November 2017
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
We examine the feasibility of phytoremediation as an alternative strategy to limit the exposure of asbestos in site with asbestos-containing materials. We collected soils from four locations from two sites-one with naturally occurring asbestos, and another, a superfund site, where asbestos-containing materials were disposed over decades-and performed ecotoxicology tests. We also performed two experiments with crop cultivar and two grasses from serpentine ecotype and cultivar to determined best choice for phytoremediation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hazard Mater
January 2018
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States. Electronic address:
Asbestos fibers are highly toxic (Group 1 carcinogen) due to their high aspect ratio, durability, and the presence of iron. In nature, plants, fungi, and microorganisms release exudates, which can alter the physical and chemical properties of soil minerals including asbestos minerals. We examined whether exudates from bacteria and fungi at environmentally relevant concentrations can alter chrysotile, the most widely used asbestos mineral, and lower its toxicity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnviron Toxicol Chem
April 2004
Interdepartmental Centre G. Scansetti for Studies on Asbestos and Other Toxic Particulates, Università di Torino, via P. Giuria 7-10125 Torino, Italy.
Iron, a structural component of most asbestos, is thought to play a crucial role in asbestos toxicity. Surface iron favors fiber uptake by mammalian cells and promotes the generation of free radicals with consequent DNA and lipid damage. In some cases, chemical removal of iron from asbestos fibers has reduced several cellular responses to asbestos.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!