Costs of Robotic-Assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopy in Endometrial Cancer.

Int J Gynecol Cancer

*Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital; †Science Centre, Pirkanmaa Hospital District; ‡Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere; §Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

Published: October 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the costs of traditional laparoscopy and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in treating endometrial cancer, analyzing 101 patients from 2010 to 2013.
  • The results showed that robotic-assisted laparoscopy had a total cost that was €2160 higher than traditional laparoscopy, primarily due to increased expenses for instruments and equipment.
  • Overall, robotic laparoscopy was found to be 37% more expensive, mainly due to the amortization costs associated with the robotic system and its tools.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the costs of traditional laparoscopy and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the treatment of endometrial cancer.

Methods And Materials: A total of 101 patients with endometrial cancer were randomized to the study and operated on starting from 2010 until 2013, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. Costs were calculated based on internal accounting, hospital database, and purchase prices and were compared using intention-to-treat analysis. Main outcome measures were item costs and total costs related to the operation, including a 6-month postoperative follow-up.

Results: The total costs including late complications were 2160 &OV0556; higher in the robotic group (median for traditional 5823 &OV0556;, vs robot median 7983 &OV0556;, P < 0.001). The difference was due to higher costs for instruments and equipment as well as to more expensive operating room and postanesthesia care unit time. Traditional laparoscopy involved higher costs for operation personnel, general costs, medication used in the operation, and surgeon, although these costs were not substantial. There was no significant difference in in-patient stay, laboratory, radiology, blood products, or costs related to complications.

Conclusions: According to this study, robotic-assisted laparoscopy is 37% more expensive than traditional laparoscopy in the treatment of endometrial cancer. The cost difference is mainly explained by amortization of the robot and its instrumentation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001073DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

traditional laparoscopy
16
endometrial cancer
12
costs
11
robotic-assisted laparoscopy
8
laparoscopy treatment
8
treatment endometrial
8
total costs
8
costs operation
8
higher costs
8
laparoscopy
6

Similar Publications

Background: Patients with prior abdominal surgeries are at higher risk of intra-peritoneal adhesions near the trocar entry site, increasing the likelihood of organ injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study evaluates a novel technique where the epigastric trocar is inserted first, after creating pneumoperitoneum, to allow safe dissection of adhesions under direct vision before placing the umbilical trocar.

Methods: This prospective study included 244 patients with symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease and a history of previous abdominal surgeries extending to the umbilicus.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Laparoscopic surgery training is a demanding process requiring technical and nontechnical skills. Surgical training has evolved from traditional approaches to the use of immersive digital technologies such as virtual, augmented, and mixed reality. These technologies are now integral to laparoscopic surgery training.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intraoperative and postoperative biliary injuries remain significant complications of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Indocyanine green (ICG) has been shown to significantly reduce injuries caused by intraoperative operational errors. We found that the J-tube can reduce postoperative strictures and injuries to the common bile duct.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects millions globally, with traditional treatments like proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and surgical fundoplication presenting challenges such as long-term medication dependency and disturbing long term side effects following surgery. This review explores emerging, alternative therapies that offer less invasive, personalized alternatives for GERD management. Endoscopic approaches, including Stretta therapy, transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and endoscopic full-thickness plication (EFTP), demonstrate promising but also controversial outcomes in symptom relief and reduced acid exposure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Selective Minimally Invasive Strategy for Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Obstruction.

J Vasc Surg

January 2025

Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University. Electronic address:

Objective: Acute mesenteric artery obstruction is a severe cause of acute mesenteric ischemia, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, there is limited guidance on choosing between traditional and minimally invasive techniques comprehensively. This study introduces a selective, minimally invasive strategy designed to improve the survival and prognosis of patients with acute superior mesenteric artery obstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!