Evidence of auditory insensitivity to vocalization frequencies in two frogs.

Sci Rep

Laboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros (LaHNAB), Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-862, Brazil.

Published: September 2017

The emergence and maintenance of animal communication systems requires the co-evolution of signal and receiver. Frogs and toads rely heavily on acoustic communication for coordinating reproduction and typically have ears tuned to the dominant frequency of their vocalizations, allowing discrimination from background noise and heterospecific calls. However, we present here evidence that two anurans, Brachycephalus ephippium and B. pitanga, are insensitive to the sound of their own calls. Both species produce advertisement calls outside their hearing sensitivity range and their inner ears are partly undeveloped, which accounts for their lack of high-frequency sensitivity. If unheard by the intended receivers, calls are not beneficial to the emitter and should be selected against because of the costs associated with signal production. We suggest that protection against predators conferred by their high toxicity might help to explain why calling has not yet disappeared, and that visual communication may have replaced auditory in these colourful, diurnal frogs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608807PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12145-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

evidence auditory
4
auditory insensitivity
4
insensitivity vocalization
4
vocalization frequencies
4
frequencies frogs
4
frogs emergence
4
emergence maintenance
4
maintenance animal
4
animal communication
4
communication systems
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!