Understanding and Resolving Conflicting Traditions: A MacIntyrean Approach to Shared Deliberation in Medical Ethics.

HEC Forum

Department of Philosophy, Saint Louis University, 3800 Lindell Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63116, USA.

Published: March 2018

The position of clinical ethicist exists to help resolve conflicts in the hospital. Sometimes these conflicts arise because of fundamental cultural differences between the patient and the medical team, and such cases present special challenges. Should the ideology of modern medicine reject the wishes of those who hold ideologies from differing cultures? How can the medical ethicist help resolve such conflicts? To answer these questions, I rely on the works of Alasdair MacIntyre. Using MacIntyre's philosophy, we can better understand why traditions exist, how conflicts arise, and how opposing traditions can collaborate in shared decision making. In order to overcome conflict, I conclude that MacIntyre's virtues of acknowledged dependence must be realized by the ethicist and those in disagreement over tradition. I use a case study of a young Amish patient to highlight the conflicts that arise and to help exhibit how shared decision making can be made possible.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10730-017-9337-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

help resolve
8
shared decision
8
decision making
8
understanding resolving
4
resolving conflicting
4
conflicting traditions
4
traditions macintyrean
4
macintyrean approach
4
approach shared
4
shared deliberation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!