Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Present echocardiographic scoring systems for percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) have limitations, and no scoring system is significant determinant of procedural outcome. In this study, we assess the relationship between various echocardiographic parameters and scoring systems with immediate outcomes and test an integrated approach by combining Wilkins score with other parameters.
Methods: One hundred two patients who had undergone PMV were included in this prospective observational study. Preprocedural mitral valve morphology was assessed and categorized using Wilkins score, Sutaria scoring system, and Nunes quantitative scoring system.
Results: Optimal PMV results were obtained in 84 patients (82.35%), and suboptimal PMV results were obtained in 18 patients (17.65%). Using Nunes scoring system, suboptimal PMV results were obtained in 9 (37.5%) patients of high-risk group (n=24), 8 (13.8%) of intermediate-risk group (n=58), and one (5%) patient of low-risk group (n=20). Using Wilkins scoring system, in patients having score>8 (n=16) suboptimal results were obtained in 5 (31.7%) and in patients having score<8 (n=86) suboptimal results were obtained in 13 (15.1%). Using Sutaria scoring system, in patients having score 3 to 4 (low risk, n=68) suboptimal results were obtained in 6 (8.8%), and in patients having score 0-2 (high risk, n=34) suboptimal results were obtained in 12 (35.3%) patients.
Conclusion: All echocardiographic scores have significant limitations, and an integrative approach is mandatory. Combining traditional Wilkins score with Sutaria score and commissural area ratio better predicts procedural outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.13635 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!