Background: A watertight dural repair is critical to minimizing the risk of postoperative complications secondary to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel hydrogel, Adherus Dural Sealant, when compared with control, DuraSeal Dural Sealant System, as an adjunct to standard methods of dural repair.

Methods: In this 17-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial designed as a noninferiority, single-blinded study, 124 patients received Adherus Dural Sealant (test sealant) and 126 received DuraSeal (control). The primary composite endpoint was the proportion of patients who were free of any intraoperative CSF leakage during Valsalva maneuver after dural repair, CSF leak/pseudomeningocele, and unplanned retreatment of the surgical site. Each component was then analyzed individually as a secondary endpoint. Patients were followed for 4 mo after surgery.

Results: The primary composite endpoint at the 120-d follow-up was achieved in 91.2% of the test sealant group compared with 90.6% of the control, thus showing that the test sealant was statistically significantly noninferior to DuraSeal ( P = .0049). Post hoc analysis of the primary composite endpoint at 14 d demonstrated superiority of the test sealant over the control ( P = .030). Primary endpoint failures in the control group tended to occur early in follow-up period, while a majority of test dural sealant failures were identified through protocol-required radiographic imaging at the 120-d follow-up visit.

Conclusion: The test sealant, Adherus Dural Sealant, is a practical, safe, and effective adjunct to achieving a watertight dural closure after primary dural closure in cranial procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opw004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dural sealant
24
test sealant
20
dural
12
dural repair
12
adherus dural
12
primary composite
12
composite endpoint
12
sealant
11
randomized clinical
8
clinical trial
8

Similar Publications

: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas remain a significant concern in spinal neurosurgery, particularly following dural closure. The incidence of dural tears during spinal surgery is estimated between 1.6% and 10%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This surgical video demonstrates the full-endoscopic repair of an incidental durotomy, offering practical guidance and insights into the technique. Incidental dural tears occur in up to 1% of lumbar endoscopic surgeries, with risk factors including interlaminar approaches, stenosis decompression, and power drill usage. Although many dural tears are managed with sealant or gel foam, no standard exists for when surgical repair is necessary.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Role of CT myelography in the diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg

December 2024

CHU de Lille, 2 Avenue Oscar Lambret, Hauts-de-France, France. Electronic address:

Introduction: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a secondary cause of headache. Its pathophysiology is complex, and relies mainly on the notion of a localized leak, and thus a loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the spinal region. SIH is little known to the medical profession, for which CT myelography is a technique on the rise, allowing to identify and treat the leak using a blood-patch or a fibrin sealant.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates the in vivo degradation and effectiveness of a photocrosslinkable hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dural sealant in preventing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage using MRI and histopathological analysis.
  • HA photosealants were applied to rat dura after a surgical procedure and showed quick sealing upon light exposure, with degradation monitored through MRI scans over 4 weeks.
  • Results indicated that the HA photosealants gradually degraded while effectively preventing CSF leakage and showed no adverse effects on surrounding tissue, suggesting strong potential for clinical use in dural repair.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Incidental durotomy (ID) is a common issue in spine surgeries that can lead to longer hospital stays and complications like pseudomeningocele formation, prompting a study comparing traditional open vs. minimally invasive (MIS) microdiscectomy techniques.
  • The study included 192 MIS patients and 2902 open surgery patients, ultimately analyzing 156 matched patients from both groups for ID occurrences and complications.
  • Results showed a similar incidence rate of ID in both methods (3.1% total), with one re-operation in the open cohort for pseudomeningocele, but no significant difference in re-operation rates between the two groups, highlighting the need for more extensive future research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!