Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD.

Chest

Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Division of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Published: December 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • New guidelines for methacholine challenge testing suggest reporting results by dose instead of concentration, leading to a study comparing a new vibrating mesh nebulizer (Solo) with the traditional Wright jet nebulizer.
  • Fifteen asthma patients underwent four challenges to assess the effectiveness and repeatability of both nebulizers, with a focus on the doses needed to trigger a 20% decline in lung function.
  • The results showed similar doses required for both nebulizers but significantly lower concentrations with the Solo, indicating that this new method is reliable and aligns with updated testing recommendations.

Article Abstract

Background: New guidelines for methacholine challenge testing recommend reporting the test outcome as dose rather than concentration. Jet nebulizers have historically been used for methacholine challenge testing, but much of the weight loss, often (incorrectly) referred to as aerosol output, is actually evaporation. The Wright nebulizer is well characterized and still widely used, but its availability is unclear, and it is nondisposable. We developed a novel method using a vibrating mesh nebulizer (Solo). This method was compared with the standard 2-min tidal breathing method using the Wright nebulizer. Repeatability within and between nebulizers was also tested.

Methods: Fifteen patients with mild asthma completed four methacholine challenges (two with the Solo vibrating mesh nebulizer and two with the Wright jet nebulizer). Challenges with the same nebulizer were 24 h apart, and challenges between nebulizers were separated by 1 week. Standard 2-min tidal breathing methods were used with the Wright nebulizer. For the Solo nebulizer, the tidal breathing method was modified by nebulizing to completion 0.5 mL of doubling concentrations of methacholine at 5-min intervals.

Results: Geometric mean methacholine doses required to cause a 20% fall in FEV were similar (96 vs 110 μg; P > .05); methacholine concentrations that caused a 20% fall in FEV were significantly lower with the vibrating mesh nebulizer (0.48 vs 4.4 mg/mL; P < .001). Repeatability of methacholine doses required to cause a 20% fall in FEV within and between nebulizers was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.92).

Conclusions: We have developed a novel, simple, repeatable method for conducting methacholine challenges using new nebulizer technology. Importantly, the method meets recommendations set out in the new guidelines.

Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: 02965482; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.09.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

methacholine challenge
12
challenge testing
12
wright nebulizer
12
vibrating mesh
12
mesh nebulizer
12
tidal breathing
12
20% fall fev
12
nebulizer
10
methacholine
9
novel method
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!