To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. We searched PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials in English language. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the MG patients were extracted. Differences in the current glucocorticoids (GC) dose in each included study were the primary outcome measure. The adverse events reported in each included study were used as safety evaluation. There were 5 trials included involving 683 patients. In this systematic review, we identified treatment with tacrolimus did not exhibit a statistically significant difference in the GC dose reduction at 6 months and 12 months compared with placebo. The standard mean differences in the GC dose reduction were -1.95 [(-4.20 to 0.30); p = 0.09] at 6 months and -1.72 [(-4.21 to 0.77); p = 0.18] at 12 months. But GC dose reduction from baseline in the tacrolimus group exceeded that in the controlled group. The weighted mean differences were -1.34 [(-2.46 to 0.23); p = 0.02] in the quantitative myasthenia gravis score and -1.10 [(-1.84 to -0.36); p = 0.004] in the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living score at 6 months. Adverse events were recorded in 80 of 347 patients (23%) treated with tacrolimus and most of them were mild. This meta-analysis proves that tacrolimus therapy is beneficial to improve clinical symptoms in MG patients. Tacrolimus may be a worthy therapy to relieve MG symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8616-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

myasthenia gravis
16
systematic review
12
dose reduction
12
efficacy safety
8
safety tacrolimus
8
gravis systematic
8
review meta-analysis
8
controlled trials
8
included study
8
adverse events
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!