AI Article Synopsis

  • Benralizumab is an antibody treatment for severe asthma that helps reduce flare-ups and improve lung function, particularly focusing on patients with high eosinophil levels in their blood.
  • The study analyzed data from two large clinical trials (SIROCCO and CALIMA) to evaluate the effectiveness of benralizumab doses given every 4 or 8 weeks compared to a placebo, paying attention to patients’ baseline eosinophil counts and their history of asthma attacks.
  • Results indicated that patients on benralizumab had significantly lower annual exacerbation rates compared to those on placebo, with the reduction in flare-ups being more substantial in patients with higher eosinophil counts and more frequent asthma attacks prior to the study

Article Abstract

Background: Benralizumab is an anti-eosinophilic, anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that has been shown to significantly reduce asthma exacerbations and improve lung function for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. We further explored the efficacy of benralizumab for patients with different baseline blood eosinophil thresholds and exacerbation histories.

Methods: This study is a pooled analysis of the results from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) phase 3 studies. In these studies, patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg, either every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (with first three doses given every 4 weeks), or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate (AER) ratio versus placebo, analysed by baseline eosinophil counts (≥0, ≥150, ≥300, or ≥450 cells per μL) and by number of exacerbations (two vs three or more) during the year before enrolment. The analyses were done in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle.

Findings: Of 2295 patients, 756 received benralizumab every 4 weeks, 762 received benralizumab every 8 weeks, and 777 patients received placebo. AER among patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least 0 cells per μL was 1·16 (95% CI 1·05-1·28) in patients who received placebo versus 0·75 (0·66-0·84) in patients who received benralizumab every 8 weeks (rate ratio 0·64, 0·55-0·75; p<0·0001). In patients who received benralizumab every 4 weeks who had eosinophil counts of 0 or more cells per μL, AER was 0·73 (0·65-0·82); rate ratio versus placebo was 0·63 (0·54-0·74; p<0·0001). The extent to which exacerbation rates were reduced increased with increasing blood eosinophil thresholds and with greater exacerbation history in patients in the 4-weekly and 8-weekly benralizumab groups. Greater improvements in AER were seen with benralizumab compared with placebo for patients with a combination of high blood eosinophil thresholds and a history of more frequent exacerbations.

Interpretation: These results will help to guide clinicians when they are deciding whether to use benralizumab to treat patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma.

Funding: AstraZeneca.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30344-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

benralizumab weeks
16
patients severe
12
received benralizumab
12
patients received
12
patients
9
benralizumab patients
8
pooled analysis
8
severe uncontrolled
8
uncontrolled asthma
8
patients baseline
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!