A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Surveillance Imaging in Patients With Endometrial Cancer in First Remission. | LitMetric

Surveillance Imaging in Patients With Endometrial Cancer in First Remission.

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol

Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address:

Published: September 2018

Objective: The clinical benefit of surveillance imaging in endometrial cancer remains undefined. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of surveillance imaging in endometrial cancer.

Methods: A total of 128 patients in first remission after treatment for endometrial cancer (uterine papillary serous, clear cell, stage III endometroid) who had surveillance imaging were retrospectively identified. The surveillance period was defined from the time of first-negative scan after treatment to the time when treatment was started for recurrent disease. Reports of surveillance scans were reviewed for the presence or absence of findings. The primary outcome was PPV of surveillance imaging. Cost and radiation exposure from surveillance imaging were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 128 patients had 707 surveillance scans (computed tomography, positron emission tomography-computed tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-d-glucose, magnetic resonance image, and bone scans). Median follow-up was 54 months (range: 9-173). Of all, 47 patients (37%) started therapy for recurrent endometrial cancer at the discretion of the treating physician. PPV of all surveillance imaging was 57.7%. Per patient, the mean number of surveillance scans was 5.6 (range: 2-21). The mean cost of imaging was $4200 (range: $1200-$18,700) and mean radiation exposure was 109.6mSV (range: 16-445mSv).

Conclusions: Surveillance imaging detected a significant number of recurrences in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer at a reasonable cost related to the overall risk. Well-designed prospective imaging trials are warranted to assess the clinical benefit of surveillance imaging.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.08.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surveillance imaging
36
endometrial cancer
20
surveillance
13
ppv surveillance
12
surveillance scans
12
imaging
10
clinical benefit
8
benefit surveillance
8
imaging endometrial
8
total 128
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!