Objective:  This article aims to evaluate whether the use of a double-balloon catheter with oral misoprostol results in a lower rate of cesarean and shorter times to delivery than the use of the double-balloon catheter with oral placebo.

Study Design:  In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, a double-balloon catheter was used for induction of labor with two doses of either 50 µg of misoprostol or placebo. Outcomes included cesarean rate, time to vaginal delivery, change in Bishop's score, and oxytocin usage.

Results:  A total of 343 women were screened and 199 randomized: 99 to the misoprostol arm and 100 to the placebo arm. Cesarean delivery rate was not different between the groups (misoprostol: 13.1% vs. placebo: 17.0%,  = 0.45). Time to vaginal delivery was significantly shorter (mean: 14.6 ± 6.9 vs. 20.8 ± 13.8 hours,  < 0.0001), change in Bishop's score was significantly greater (median: 5 vs. 4 points,  = 0.005), and use of oxytocin was significantly less frequent (86.9 vs. 98.0% patients,  = 0.01) in the misoprostol group.

Conclusion:  The use of a double-balloon catheter with oral misoprostol for induction did not reduce the cesarean delivery rate, but did result in shorter labors, a greater increase in Bishop's score, and a lower need for oxytocin use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606606DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

double-balloon catheter
16
catheter induction
8
double-blind randomized
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
catheter oral
8
time vaginal
8
vaginal delivery
8
misoprostol
5
misoprostol addition
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!