AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the effectiveness of Cefoxitin versus Methicillin/Oxacillin in detecting the mecA gene in Methicillin-resistant Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS).
  • Among 57 CoNS isolates tested, all 41 mecA-positive samples showed resistance to Cefoxitin, while 80.5% were resistant to Methicillin/Oxacillin.
  • The findings suggest that Cefoxitin resistance is a more reliable indicator of mecA positivity compared to Methicillin and Oxacillin tests.

Article Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of Cefoxitin with that of Methicillin/Oxacillin in the determination of mecAgene in Methicillin resistant Coagulase-negative staphylococci(CoNS). We assessed 57 CoNS isolates for mecA gene via PCR, which were subsequently subjected to Methicillin/Oxacillin and Cefoxitin disc diffusion test. These methods are simple, inexpensive and easily available compared to PCR despite less specificity. Out of 41 mecApositive species, 33 (80.5%) were resistant to Methicillin/Oxacillin. Cefoxitin-resistance was seen in all 41 (100%) mecApositive samples. Two (12.5%) mecAnegative isolates of S.saprophyticuswere Methicillin/Oxacillin resistant, but were Cefoxitin sensitive. Four (9.7%) isolates of S.saprophyticus, three (7.3%) of S.epidermidisspecies, and one (2.4%) S.haemolyticusthat were mecApositive were sensitive to Methicillin/Oxacillin but resistant to Cefoxitin. Cefoxitin resistance provides a more accurate picture of mecAgene positivity as compared to Methicillin and Oxacillin.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

methicillin/oxacillin resistant
8
resistant cefoxitin
8
cefoxitin
6
methicillin/oxacillin
5
comparison oxacillin
4
oxacillin cefoxitin
4
cefoxitin detection
4
detection mecagene
4
mecagene determine
4
determine methicillin
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!