A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Liver Tunnel: Intention-to-treat Validation of a New Type of Hepatectomy. | LitMetric

The Liver Tunnel: Intention-to-treat Validation of a New Type of Hepatectomy.

Ann Surg

Division of Hepatobiliary & General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Published: February 2019

Objective: This prospective intention-to-treat validation study evaluated the liver tunnel (LT) technique for patients having ≥1 deep centrally located liver tumor, with or without middle hepatic vein (MHV) invasion.

Background: Conservative surgery has been proposed for patients with deep liver tumors having complex relationships. LT is one such novel technique.

Methods: Eligible patients were prospectively enrolled for LT. LT relies on tumor-vessel detachment, and the presence of communicating veins if MHV resection is necessary.

Results: Twenty consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria: 17 had colorectal liver metastases, 1 had hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 had mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 had mixed hepatocellular carcinoma-mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma. Nineteen patients underwent LT. The MHV was resected in 6 patients, always sparing segments 4i and 5. Overall, 180 lesions were removed (median 7; range 1-37): 79 lesions were included in the LT specimen (median 3; range 1-13). There was no in-hospital 90-day mortality. Overall morbidity occurred in 10 (50%) patients: major in 2 (10%). All complications were managed conservatively. After a median 15-month follow-up (range 6-48), 2 instances of cut-edge local recurrences were observed.

Conclusions: This study shows that LT is technically feasible and safe. Further studies are needed for standardizing its use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002509DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver tunnel
8
intention-to-treat validation
8
median range
8
patients
7
liver
5
tunnel intention-to-treat
4
validation type
4
type hepatectomy
4
hepatectomy objective
4
objective prospective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!