Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke.

N Engl J Med

From the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles (J.L.S.); University of Colorado, Denver, and University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora (J.D.C.), and South Denver Cardiology, Swedish Medical Center, Littleton (L.A.M.) - all in Colorado; Tufts University, Tufts Medical Center, Boston (D.E.T.); University of Texas, Memorial Hermann Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston (R.W.S.); Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.S.M.); and University of Washington, Seattle (D.L.T.).

Published: September 2017

Background: Whether closure of a patent foramen ovale reduces the risk of recurrence of ischemic stroke in patients who have had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke is unknown.

Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, with blinded adjudication of end-point events, we randomly assigned patients 18 to 60 years of age who had a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and had had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke to undergo closure of the PFO (PFO closure group) or to receive medical therapy alone (aspirin, warfarin, clopidogrel, or aspirin combined with extended-release dipyridamole; medical-therapy group). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of recurrent nonfatal ischemic stroke, fatal ischemic stroke, or early death after randomization. The results of the analysis of the primary outcome from the original trial period have been reported previously; the current analysis of data from the extended follow-up period was considered to be exploratory.

Results: We enrolled 980 patients (mean age, 45.9 years) at 69 sites. Patients were followed for a median of 5.9 years. Treatment exposure in the two groups was unequal (3141 patient-years in the PFO closure group vs. 2669 patient-years in the medical-therapy group), owing to a higher dropout rate in the medical-therapy group. In the intention-to-treat population, recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 18 patients in the PFO closure group and in 28 patients in the medical-therapy group, resulting in rates of 0.58 events per 100 patient-years and 1.07 events per 100 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio with PFO closure vs. medical therapy, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.999; P=0.046 by the log-rank test). Recurrent ischemic stroke of undetermined cause occurred in 10 patients in the PFO closure group and in 23 patients in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.79; P=0.007). Venous thromboembolism (which comprised events of pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis) was more common in the PFO closure group than in the medical-therapy group.

Conclusions: Among adults who had had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke, closure of a PFO was associated with a lower rate of recurrent ischemic strokes than medical therapy alone during extended follow-up. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; RESPECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00465270 .).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1610057DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ischemic stroke
32
pfo closure
24
closure group
20
medical-therapy group
20
medical therapy
16
patent foramen
12
foramen ovale
12
cryptogenic ischemic
12
recurrent ischemic
12
closure
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!