Comparing long-acting reversible contraception insertion rates in women with Medicaid vs. private insurance in a clinic with a two-visit protocol.

Contraception

Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. Electronic address:

Published: January 2018

Objective: This study examined whether women with Medicaid are less likely to receive long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in a clinic requiring two visits for insertion.

Study Design: LARC insertion and pregnancy rates were compared among women with Medicaid vs. private insurance, along with other predictors, in a retrospective chart review (N=447).

Results: Univariately, fewer women with Medicaid vs. private insurance received LARC (66% vs. 79%, p<.01) and more become pregnant (18% vs. 6%, p<.001). Significant multivariate predictors of not receiving LARC were being unmarried and postpartum, both of which were associated with having Medicaid.

Conclusion: Women with Medicaid are less likely than women with private insurance to have a requested LARC device inserted when a clinic requires two visits for insertion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5732034PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

women medicaid
16
medicaid private
12
private insurance
12
long-acting reversible
8
reversible contraception
8
comparing long-acting
4
contraception insertion
4
insertion rates
4
women
4
rates women
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!