A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Basic study of intratracheal instillation study of nanomaterials for the estimation of the hazards of nanomaterials. | LitMetric

In order to examine the usefulness of intratracheal instillation of nanoparticles for the screening of the harmful effects of nanoparticles, we performed intratracheal instillation studies of nanomaterials on rats using different delivery devices and postures as a basic study. Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with a geometric mean length and secondary diameter of 2.16 μm and 752 nm, respectively, were used as the nanomaterials. Male F344 rats were intratracheally exposed to 0.04 or 0.2 mg/rat of MWCNT, were dissected at 1 d and 3 d, and cell analyses of the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were analyzed. Two delivery devices were used for the intratracheal instillation of the MWCNTs: a gavage needle and a microsprayer aerolizer. Both induced neutrophil influx in the lung at 1 and 3 d, and there were no significant differences in neutrophil inflammation between the two delivery devices. The main distribution of pulmonary inflammation by both delivery devices was in the centrilobular spaces in the lung. Two postures were used: an angle of approximately 45 degrees and a standing posture on a board, both of which also induced pulmonary influx in BALF and pulmonary inflammation mainly in the centrilobular spaces, with no large difference in pulmonary inflammation between the two postures. Taken together, the differences in the delivery devices and postures of the rats in the intratracheal instillation did not affect the acute pulmonary toxicity of the nanomaterials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800863PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2017-0082DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intratracheal instillation
20
delivery devices
20
pulmonary inflammation
12
basic study
8
devices postures
8
inflammation delivery
8
centrilobular spaces
8
intratracheal
5
instillation
5
nanomaterials
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!