AI Article Synopsis

  • Next generation sequencing (NGS) shows promise for cancer molecular diagnosis, but requires validation for its accuracy in detecting DNA alterations, particularly in clinical samples.
  • The study establishes basic parameters for targeted NGS using genomic DNA from diverse sources and compares its performance with conventional methods like ARMS, FISH, and IHC.
  • Results indicate that targeted NGS exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for detecting various genetic variants, including single nucleotide variations and copy number variations, making it a reliable tool for cancer diagnosis.

Article Abstract

Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) is being increasingly applied for assisting cancer molecular diagnosis. However, it is still needed to validate NGS accuracy on detection of DNA alternations based on a large number of clinical samples, especially for DNA rearrangements and copy number variations (CNVs). This study is to set up basic parameters of targeted NGS for clinical diagnosis and to understand advantage of targeted NGS in comparison with the conventional methods of molecular diagnosis.

Methods: Genomic DNA from 1000 Genomes Project and DNA from cancer cell lines have been used to establish the basic parameters for targeted NGS. The following confirmation was conducted by clinical samples. The multiple variants tested by amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were evaluated by targeted NGS to determine the sensitivity. Furthermore, the multiple variants detected by targeted NGS were confirmed by current conventional methods to elucidate the specificity.

Results: At sequencing depth of 500×, the maximal sensitivities on detecting single nucletic variances (SNVs) and small insertions/deletions (Indels) can reach 99% and 98.7% respectively, and in 20% of cancer cells, CNV detection can reach to the maximal level. The following confirmation of the sensitivity and specificity was conducted by a large cohort of clinical samples. For SNV and indel detection in clinical samples, targeted NGS can identify all hotspot mutations with 100% sensitivity and specificity. On ALK fusion detection, about 86% IHC-identified cases could be identified by targeted NGS and all ALK fusion detected by targeted NGS were confirmed by IHC. For HER2-amplification, 14 HER2-amplification cases identified by target NGS were all confirmed by FISH and about 93.3% of Her-2 IHC (3+) cases were identified by targeted NGS. Finally, the targeted NGS platform developed here has accurately detected EGFR hotspot mutations in 215 NSCLC patients.

Conclusions: DNA from cancer cell lines is better than standard DNA as a reference to establish basic parameters for targeted NGS. Comparison of the conventional methods using a large cohort of patient samples confirmed the high preformance of targeted NGS on detecting DNA alterations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590190PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-017-0591-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

targeted ngs
48
conventional methods
16
clinical samples
16
ngs
15
targeted
13
basic parameters
12
parameters targeted
12
ngs confirmed
12
cases identified
12
generation sequencing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!